Author Topic: More Fake Pictures of Oswald (Read 30178 times)

Jerry Freeman · « **on:** June 18, 2018, 03:37:32 AM »

The parrots' feathers really get ruffled when actual physical evidence of Oswald getting framed appear in the world of the composite Cover-up.
Who can't tell this picture is a fake.......? Does the left side of the face look like Oswald? How about the right? Naahh?
A double hairline... a double lip line....OK the chin isn't square....eyebrow looks like it's painted...one eye looks bigger than the other...and...the sun isn't shining.
That about cover it? Rwwwaaawkk I can hear them already!

JFK Assassination Forum · « **on:** June 18, 2018, 03:37:32 AM »

John Mytton · « **Reply #1 on:** June 18, 2018, 04:52:10 AM »

Nope, even though Oswald has lost some childhood puppy fat, the facial proportions never change. Both Oswalds display the exact same ratios between eyes, nose, ears, chin, forehead and the overall head shape is identical.

In the following rotating morph, Oswald's features are all in perfect alignment, proving beyond all doubt they are the same person.

Btw next time before you embarrass yourself, PM me and I can point you in the right direction.

JohnM

Matt Grantham · « **Reply #2 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:05:38 AM »

The melding photography process is not convincing It couild be done with plenty of dissimilar pictures to trick the mind into believing they could be melded Also whats up with the weird ridge on the right side of the forehead of Jerry's picture

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #2 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:05:38 AM »

John Mytton · « **Reply #3 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:14:30 AM »

Quote from: Matt Grantham on June 18, 2018, 05:05:38 AM

The melding photography process is not convincing It couild be done with plenty of dissimilar pictures to trick the mind into believing they could be melded Also whats up with the weird ridge on the right side of the forehead of Jerry's picture

Matt, this procedure is based on the same principle as the iphone facial recognition software and is virtually infallible.

How about you provide two faces that are perhaps celebrity lookalikes and let's see just how similar two faces can actually be.

JohnM

Matt Grantham · « **Reply #4 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:27:34 AM »

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173319

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #4 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:27:34 AM »

John Mytton · « **Reply #5 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:36:08 AM »

Even when the best celebrity lookalikes are directly compared to their chosen celebrity the list of facial differences becomes obvious and instead of smooth rotation we simply have a face being pulled in random directions.

JohnM

Matt Grantham · « **Reply #6 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:45:09 AM »

Perhaps submit your refutation to Plos One, which is one of the most respected peer reviewed journals around

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #6 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:45:09 AM »

John Mytton · « **Reply #7 on:** June 18, 2018, 05:53:10 AM »

Quote from: Matt Grantham on June 18, 2018, 05:27:34 AM

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173319

Huh? Pulling a single morphed face off of two images to use as false ID is going to show you what exactly?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

News: