|
|
 July 15, 2009, 03:51:23 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2660
|
Here part 1-5 uninterrupted. Basically lots and lots of news footage and interviews from the Kennedy assasination, attempting to show orwellian revision of history as the story unfolds. Interesting synchronised splitscreen footage from multiple cameras. Skip intro. 1hr 40 mins, and that's just Part 1 of 5. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginMartin
-------------------------
-------------------------
Firework As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginGod bless Emmett Till: As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginInsipired by the Movie "Invictus" and Nelson Mandela. What a poem! As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
July 15, 2009, 05:25:32 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2094
|
Why not watch it here thumbs1xx
-------------------------
-------------------------
An opinion based on something other than fact, is an opinion based on ignorance. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 17, 2009, 10:32:06 AM
|
Newbie
Posts: 17
|
That is an absolutely fascinating video.
As someone very new to the case, the first few questions which come to mind are:
1. Was the gun found in the TSBD a Mauser or Mannlicher-Carcano ?
2. At 1.09.40 in the video when Oswald was being transferred, the man in front of him did not flinch when Ruby's shot rang out, i find that totally amazing. He did not even turn to see what happened right away.
3. Why was Capt Fritz so evasive ? he could not answer anything.
Also, when Jack Ruby made the "pertaining to his situation" statement, what point was he really trying to get across ?
thanks
-------------------------
-------------------------
I emphatically deny these charges !
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
 Ian Lloyd |
July 17, 2009, 07:56:09 PM
|
Group: Guest
|
That is an absolutely fascinating video.
As someone very new to the case, the first few questions which come to mind are:
1. Was the gun found in the TSBD a Mauser or Mannlicher-Carcano ? Still debated but I suspect the M-C.
2. At 1.09.40 in the video when Oswald was being transferred, the man in front of him did not flinch when Ruby's shot rang out, i find that totally amazing. He did not even turn to see what happened right away. I believe you are referring to Fritz there.
3. Why was Capt Fritz so evasive ? he could not answer anything. Arrogance?
Also, when Jack Ruby made the "pertaining to his situation" statement, what point was he really trying to get across ? Very good question to which,IMO, nobody knows the answer nor ever will.
thanks
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2009, 01:13:45 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9052
|
That is an absolutely fascinating video.
As someone very new to the case, the first few questions which come to mind are:
1. Was the gun found in the TSBD a Mauser or Mannlicher-Carcano ?
2. At 1.09.40 in the video when Oswald was being transferred, the man in front of him did not flinch when Ruby's shot rang out, i find that totally amazing. He did not even turn to see what happened right away.
3. Why was Capt Fritz so evasive ? he could not answer anything.
Also, when Jack Ruby made the "pertaining to his situation" statement, what point was he really trying to get across ?
thanks
Jason, Regarding whether the rifle found was a Mannlicher-Carcano or a Mauser, check out this link from this forum: As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginDuring the shooting of Oswald, Captian Will Fritz is the man who didn't even flinch. Not really sure why, other than I guess that he didn't hear the shot. Jack Ruby simply wanted to go to Washington, nothing more. He was bored in prison and wanted to go on an "adventure" for some excitement. Because of this desire, he was willing to say anything. This is just my opinion, which makes more sense than any other theory.
-------------------------
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
Ian Lloyd |
July 20, 2009, 10:29:38 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
That is an absolutely fascinating video.
As someone very new to the case, the first few questions which come to mind are:
1. Was the gun found in the TSBD a Mauser or Mannlicher-Carcano ?
2. At 1.09.40 in the video when Oswald was being transferred, the man in front of him did not flinch when Ruby's shot rang out, i find that totally amazing. He did not even turn to see what happened right away.
3. Why was Capt Fritz so evasive ? he could not answer anything.
Also, when Jack Ruby made the "pertaining to his situation" statement, what point was he really trying to get across ?
thanks
Jason, Regarding whether the rifle found was a Mannlicher-Carcano or a Mauser, check out this link from this forum: As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginDuring the shooting of Oswald, Captian Will Fritz is the man who didn't even flinch. Not really sure why, other than I guess that he didn't hear the shot. Jack Ruby simply wanted to go to Washington, nothing more. He was bored in prison and wanted to go on an "adventure" for some excitement. Because of this desire, he was willing to say anything. This is just my opinion, which makes more sense than any other theory. Bill, That's just your opinion (you know what I mean)!!!
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2009, 12:02:06 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2660
|
Bill, That's just your opinion (you know what I mean)!!![/color][/i]
+1 Bill, somehow i think you have a tendency your mind contains the holy grail. This is just my opinion, which makes more sense than any other theory.C'mon...thats bold isn't it?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Lloyd |
July 21, 2009, 08:11:27 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
Martin, I believe the way that I stated it was very fair. It's just my opinion, which makes more sense than any other theory. That's just your opnion...(sorry Bill, couldn't resist) - I wonder, what if he'd just said "well, actually, yeah, I did know Oswald"...?
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 21, 2009, 08:13:24 AM by Ian Lloyd »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
July 21, 2009, 07:44:20 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2660
|
Martin, I believe the way that I stated it was very fair. It's just my opinion, which makes more sense than any other theory.
It may be i missunderstood you, Bill. Propably a language issue. But what about other LN opinions? Myers or Bugliosi for instance? Is your theory over the top of them? Lol Ian, good one. Let me guess what Bill would say.......yes he know Oswald from the midnight conference. Any other guess is out of logic. By the way, General Walker was more suspious about the Rubenstein--Oswald connection. best Martin
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
