HomeSubscribe Live FeedJFK Research Photo GalleryStoreJFK Youtube ChannelArticlesSearchLinksNotepadLoginRegister
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 09:17:00 AM
News:

Pages: [1] 2 3
Lee Harvey Oswald's tax retrns  (Read 1247 times)
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 93


Why not release his tax returns? If he was a lone nut assassian what could his tax records show?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 3408


Amending IRS tax code would release JFK assassination records.

The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) could not release tax records relating to certain people and businesses associated with the JFK assassination.  But, they did collect them anyway and put them into the collection at Archives II where they await some future date when they will be released.  So, a new investigation is not called for, nor is a fishing expedition.  The records were already collected.  They only need to be released to the public.  Unfortunately, this will require an Act of Congress.  Section 6103 is a federal law that prohibits federal government agencies that possess tax return information from disclosing that information.  I request that an exemption be made so that tax return information relating to individuals and businesses that have some relationship to the assassination of President Kennedy and have already been collected by the ARRB and placed in Archives II.

JFK Lancer asked for this in 1998.  JFK RESEARCH ORGANIZATION CALLS FOR AMENDMENT OF IRS CODE

These records include both tax returns from the IRS's own files, and earnings and employment information from the files of the Social Security Administration. They include records on Lee Harvey Oswald, Marina Oswald, Jack Ruby, George Sergei deMohrenschieldt, William Guy Bannister, David William Ferrie, Orest Pena, Carlos Bringuier, Carlos Quiroga, Sergio Arcacha-Smith, Antonio Vecciana, William George Gaudet, Albert Alexander Osborne (a.k.a John Howard Bowen), Palmer Edward McBride, and John Thomas Masen, as well as some groups like The Fair Play for Cuba Committee, Directorio Revolutionario Estudiantil (commonly known as the DRE), Operation Alpha-66, Segundo Frente Nacional de Escambray, Junta Revoluncionaria Cubana (commonly known as the "JURE"), Cuban Revolutionary Council (known as the "CRC"), Frente Revolucionario Democratico (known as the "FRE"), and Comandos-L, all of which are directly related to the history of the assassination.

Many of these individuals are deceased and many of these groups and businesses are defunct.  So, claims of protecting an individual's privacy is a moot point.

The ARRB commented upon the issue in Chapter 5 of their Final Report:

1. Tax Return Information

"The Review Board encountered a wide variety of tax return information in its review of assassination records. Although current federal law prohibits the IRS and other federal agencies from disseminating tax return information, in the 1960s, the IRS often shared its information with law enforcement agencies including the FBI and investigative bodies such as the Warren Commission. The Warren Commission, in particular, collected tax data on many of the individuals that it studied, including Lee Harvey Oswald.

"When Congress was considering the JFK Act, the IRS requested that the JFK Act trump current federal law protecting tax return information and allow the IRS to release tax return records relating to the assassination of the President. Congress refused to allow the IRS, or any other federal agency, to disclose tax return information. Thus, section 11(a) of the JFK Act reads, in relevant part,
"When this Act requires transmission of a record to the Archivist or public disclosure, it shall take precedence over any other law (except section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code) . . .that would otherwise prohibit such transmission or disclosure. . . .
"Section 6103 is the section of the Internal Revenue Code that prohibits federal government agencies that possess tax return information from disclosing that information.

"While the Review Board understands congressional reluctance to recklessly release the tax return information of American citizens, it is truly unfortunate that the Review Board could not make available to the public the tax return records of Lee Harvey Oswald for the years prior to the assassination. The Review Board received many inquiries from the public requesting that the Board release the Oswald tax returns so that the public could resolve inconsistencies in the data concerning Oswald's earnings. Although the IRS determined that the Review Board necessarily had to review tax return information in order to complete its work, it could not allow the Review Board to disclose tax return information unless Congress granted a specific exemption to the strictures of section 6103.

"Thus, the Review Board recommends that Congress enact legislation exempting Lee Harvey Oswald's tax return information, Oswald employment information obtained by the Social Security Administration, and other tax or IRS related information in the files of the Warren Commission and the HSCA from the protection afforded it by section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, and that such legislation direct that these records be released to the public in the JFK Collection."

Please write to your congressional representatives and ask them to amend Section 6103 of the IRS Tax Code so that these records can be released.


-------------------------

-------------------------
"Life is not a problem to be solved.  It is a mystery to be lived".

   ReplyReply
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 431


I'm all for releasing Oswald's tax returns.  It's unlikely they will show anything except that he was a poorly paid fellow.  Even if you believe he received money from the CIA or the mob it would not be reflected on a tax return.  BUT I would be reluctant to open this process up to anyone associated with the JFK assassination.  That could include numerous innocent people like Tippit or Agent Greer who have been subject to baseless witch hunts over the years.  Unless their families consent, they should not be subject to this type of release. 


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 3791

Well, somebody did it.


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Why not release his tax returns? If he was a lone nut assassian what could his tax records show?

He never signed his 1963 1040, so they can't release it.

There was a deduction for the purchase of a rifle as a work item though, I don't know if that matters, he also claimed Alek Hidell as a dependent but that's probably just coincidence.


-------------------------
« Last Edit: February 01, 2012, 04:34:52 AM by Mark Henceroth »

-------------------------
LN; So how did it happen then ?

CT; I don't know, I only know that it didn't happen the way the evidence says.

LN;  We should not use evidence in this case ?

CT; Correct.

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 6715


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Why not release his tax returns? If he was a lone nut assassian what could his tax records show?

Some kooks claim his tax returns would show payment from the FBI or CIA. But that is not how it works.
Undercover agents taxes are handled by a separate branch at the IRS so that the identity is hidden and the payments are hidden.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 3408


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Some kooks claim his tax returns would show payment from the FBI or CIA. But that is not how it works.
Undercover agents taxes are handled by a separate branch at the IRS so that the identity is hidden and the payments are hidden.


Are you implying Oswald was an undercover agent?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 1093

God knows


Can't it classified  on the basis of national security.


-------------------------

-------------------------
Let justice be done, or the heavens fall.

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 6715


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Are you implying Oswald was an undercover agent?

Not I. Others have and use it to explain why they want to see the tax returns. It was assistant DA William Alexander who started that rumor that Oswald was an FBI agent to get back at Hoover who had threatened him to get him to take
out the conspiracy language in the murder charge on Oswald.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 3408


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Some kooks claim his tax returns would show payment from the FBI or CIA. But that is not how it works.
Undercover agents taxes are handled by a separate branch at the IRS so that the identity is hidden and the payments are hidden.


Rubbish.  Firstly, clandestine service personnel are not referred to as "agents" as you've stated.  They are CIA Officers.  There is no separate branch at the IRS to handle their individual tax situations.  They are routinely paid on W2 forms in the name of companies throughout the U. S..  Do you make this crap up Marsh?


-------------------------
« Last Edit: February 02, 2012, 03:45:31 PM by Paul May »

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 1904


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Rubbish.  Firstly, clandestine service personnel are not referred to as "agents" as you've stated.  They are CIA Officers.  There is no separate branch at the IRS to handle their individual tax situations.  They are routinely paid on W2 forms in the name of companies throughout the U. S..  Do you make this crap up Marsh?
Paul you're ex ONI. If the CIA really wanted an agent to infiltrate a situation covertly, would they be so dumb as to leave a tax trail that confirms you are CIA? What if things go wrong and they want to cover their tracks? I know its hard enough to avoid paying taxes, but how do they avoid being exposed like this ?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 3408


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Paul you're ex ONI. If the CIA really wanted an agent to infiltrate a situation covertly, would they be so dumb as to leave a tax trail that confirms you are CIA? What if things go wrong and they want to cover their tracks? I know its hard enough to avoid paying taxes, but how do they avoid being exposed like this ?

The charter of any clandestine services organization is to protect assets at all costs....first!  Human and otherwise. 


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 5253


According to Mr Hamblin of the Western Union ,Oswald was getting regular small payments 10-20 dollars at a timen When he reported this to the FBI they did not legally present any Court order ( as legally required order to obtain the relevant files but instead used thier paid informants ( T-series like Harry Holmes) Why not just do the legal straight forward route to request files like they had in the past many,many times It appears they did not want to alert the legal issues involved as they would have had to share the information!.


-------------------------

-------------------------
Some things we know we know,the rest we have to find out for ourselves

 One of the first things we found out was that the Warren Commission never pursued a conspiracy investigation.
Louis Stokes

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] 2 3


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Gallery

JFKForum.com

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines