|
|
 January 05, 2012, 12:10:17 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 754
|
The Parkland Doctor's claim JFK had a huge hole on the right rear of his head, but upon closer examination they were all mistaken or lying.  These people support a shot from the Grassy Knoll?  How can there be an exit wound on the right rear of JFK's head, a shot from the Grassy Knoll has to exit on the rear left side! The only possible sniper position to create this wound as described would have to be the triple overpass, and we know that was impossible. JFK went "back and to the left" but the bullet left a hole in the right rear, where does a bullet enter to achieve JFK's violent reaction and satisfy the hole placement???  BTW where is the brain matter on the trunk, all i can see is genuine 8mm film grain accurate to a microscopic level and impossible to "paint over", therefore there was NO frontal sniper! 
-------------------------
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 02:12:49 PM
|
Full Member
Posts: 176
|
John, what do you think Mrs Kennedy was reaching for when she is seen on the trunk of the limo? Your comments about the hole in the rear of the head of JFK, are a bit like somebody saying "Because nobody saw the bullets, J.F.K. couldn't have been shot." The doctors at Parkland saw a massive hole in the back of the Presidents skull. The question is how it was caused, not that it couldn't be there because it couldn't have occurred from a Grassy Knoll shot. Or maybe you doubt the word of all the persons present at Parkland.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 02:20:04 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2201
|
The Parkland Doctor's claim JFK had a huge hole on the right rear of his head, but upon closer examination they were all mistaken or lying. The Bethesda doctors documented a scalp wound that placed the entering bullet on course for exit from the upper-right rear of the head. Were the Bethesda doctors selling fairy tales to counter the porky pies? These people support a shot from the Grassy Knoll? During the Friday afternoon press conference, Doctor Clark counterposed a tangential wound as an alternative to a frontal shot as the cause of the large right rear head wound.
How can there be an exit wound on the right rear of JFK's head, a shot from the Grassy Knoll has to exit on the rear left side!
The only possible sniper position to create this wound as described would have to be the triple overpass, and we know that was impossible.
The positions of entry and exit wounds depend upon two factors. These factors are the location of the shooter and the angular orientation of the victim. JFK went "back and to the left" but the bullet left a hole in the right rear, where does a bullet enter to achieve JFK's violent reaction and satisfy the hole placement??? A shot to the head would cause the head to move as far as permitted by its attachment to the neck before dragging the torso. However the Zapruder film shows that the moving head reached a neutral position when the torso began to move. So the filmed evidence disproves a head shot as the mechanical cause of the “back and to the left” motion of JFK. BTW where is the brain matter on the trunk, all i can see is genuine 8mm film grain accurate to a microscopic level and impossible to "paint over", therefore there was NO frontal sniper! You are seeing distortions accumulated from multiple copies of the Zapruder film. In fact, I cannot see the UHF antenna on the same trunk where you claim to see “8 mm film grain.” If your claim were correct then seeing the antenna well above the grain level on other frames would prove alteration of the Zapruder film. Herbert
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 02:22:28 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1088
|
Hello John, don't think I've spoke to you before.
Firstly, I want to point out that I feel LN'ers need to clarify their position on just what they believe bullets can do. SBT defenders (LN'ers) often remark on how a bullet upon impacting or travelling through a body, can perform numerously strange twists and turns. Some have even stated that something like a blade of grass can deflect a bullets path. So if this is the case, JFK's head may well have been hit from the front or side and the bullet didn't necessarily need to travel out the opposite side, if you believe what some say.
There is also another point you overlooked, that a possible frontal shot missed the car completely.
I am not saying any of this happened of course, but if the OP was meant to establish any fact, the only fact is has established is that the Parkland staff weren't lying. Perhaps they were under some form of mass hypnosis, perhaps they didn't know the BOH from their elbows - but the fact is that they all (or a majority atleast) believed JFK had a huge hole in the back of his spud.
That's a real problem for the official version, and that's a fact.
Cheers.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 04:17:00 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2355
Germany
|
sure there was blood on the trunk, and there was a large exit wound to the back of the head, are you blind John ?!  and since you are such an expert you can point out how you know the above is a fake. ETA: 400% enlarged  it just took me 40 minutes, it is not accurate, I am an amateur but I think it is not a bad fake. No PhotoShop Pro but a basic freeware graphic tool.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 05, 2012, 06:41:36 PM by Gerda Dunckel »
|
-------------------------
"ich bin ein Berliner" As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login"There's none so blind as those who will not see."
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 04:29:14 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1627
|
The Parkland Doctor's claim JFK had a huge hole on the right rear of his head, but upon closer examination they were all mistaken or lying.
Pay special attention to the part where he says "blood all over the back of the limo" knucklehead .... <![CDATA[As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
<a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=register">Register</a> or <a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=login">Login</a>]]> But what does he know... it's not like he was there 
-------------------------
-------------------------
"Good Christians, like slaves and soldiers, ask no questions." Jerry Falwell " I'm not  " T Winky
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 04:36:09 PM
|
Sr. Member
Posts: 431
|
Unless you believe that Connally got out of the limo and inspected the trunk area at Parkland hospital before they wheeled him into the emergency room what he clearly is referring too is the back seat area of the limo where JFK was sitting.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 04:40:03 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2094
|
He was obviously wrong. At no point during or after the head shot, in the Zapruder film, did he ever look back and see the back of the Limo. You missed out the word "Immediately" from your quote. <![CDATA[As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
<a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=register">Register</a> or <a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=login">Login</a>]]>
-------------------------
-------------------------
An opinion based on something other than fact, is an opinion based on ignorance. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 05, 2012, 04:47:20 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 571
|
 John, It seems you are twisting the evidence on this one. Kilduff, Files and the other gentleman whose name I cannot remember are pointing to an entry wound. This is confirmed by listening to their testimony as they describe the shot. Your second image seems to imply that the shooter was located behind the arched pergola wall. A shot from that direction would hit Jackie. Most of the witnesses that heard a sound from that area claimed that it came from further up the fence line and heard back to back shots. You have also claimed that it would be "impossible" for a shot to come from near the triple underpass. I might buy into your statement if anyone on planet Earth could tell me the identity of the three men shown in the picture above. Lee Bowers was not able to do it. My unproven theory is that they were also the "bad" guys providing cover for a shooter. Wes Wes, Im not sure who these individuals are on the overpass, but I know Sam Holland never said shots came from the bridge, instead he says one came from the other end of the fence. Also, Sam Holland was asked by Dallas PD to assist the two policeman stationed on the bridge in identifying railroad workers in order to keep unauthorized people from being up there. Im sure these people we see in the photo were indeed authorized to be there as in they were most likely just railroad workers.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 05, 2012, 04:52:12 PM by Mike Giampaolo »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
