|
|
 December 11, 2011, 10:55:36 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2094
|
Original frame taken from my copy of JFK The Lost Bullet DVD. What do you see? 
-------------------------
-------------------------
An opinion based on something other than fact, is an opinion based on ignorance. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 04:47:24 AM
|
Jr. Member
Posts: 92
|
Original frame taken from my copy of JFK The Lost Bullet DVD. What do you see? Great work, Duncan! I see two men standing near the window. The guy on the right is wearing a white shirt and is looking down to his left and is standing a bit farther back than the other guy. The guy on the left is wearing a tan jacket and is looking down and is possibly holding a rifle vertically, with the butt of the rifle in front of his chest and the rifle goes straight down from there. Two shocks of hair from the top-front of his head are falling onto his forehead. The guy on the right is looking down to his left and looks like he has a receding hairline and long sideburns. What do you see, Duncan? --Tommy 
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 12, 2011, 05:26:29 AM by Thomas Graves »
|
-------------------------
"Captains and kings, in the ship's hold, came to collect silver and gold" --Silver and Gold by U2
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 08:40:36 AM
|
Sr. Member
Posts: 264
|
Great, maybe it would be usefull to post the frames in the gallery. I treated without colors, but anyway i could not see a dark shirt. This artefact is on other frames?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 09:41:39 PM
|
Jr. Member
Posts: 92
|
Note: In an attempt to preserve whatever credibility I might still have on this forum (LOL) , I want y'all to know thatI posted this on the JFK Assassination Debate forum a bit earlier today before I saw Duncan's post "showing"that it is LHO in the photo.
Based on the premise that we're allowed (perhaps even encouraged) to change our minds, I now see another possibility. The two faces I "saw" earlier are still "there", but this photo is like one of those optical illusions where, for example, you see a chalice in the middle when you look at it one way and when you look at it in a different way you instead see two human faces, one male and one female, facing each othe in-profile and the chalice has "disappeared", the two relatively small images of men I mentioned earlier "disappear" when you focus your eyes differently and "realize" that there is a much larger image of a man's head in the photo and that if this image represents reality, the two smaller heads couldn't, and vice versa. The single large head, which takes up about 80% of the photo, belongs to a man who is looking far to his right and therefore his face is in about "3/4 profile". He has dark hair which is long on top and cascades over his forehead a bit as though he's styled it that way to conceal a receding hairline. He has no sideburns. Anyway, that's what I "see" now. The two smaller men are still "there" in the "background" when you focus your eyes on them, kind of like those "two faces" in the optical illusion I mentioned above. The photo is different, however, from the "chalice/two faces optical illusion" in that in this case the "chalice" (the man's head that takes up 80% of the photo) is so large that it blocks our "view" of the "two faces" (the two smaller men in the "virtual background". The problem now is deciding which image represents reality. That's hard to do because both involve problems with the scale of the two smaller men in the photo's "background" as well as the scale of the one large man in the photo's "foreground": neither seem to be realistic. It seems that small men are too small and the large face is too large. Perhaps they are all illusions.
I see other things in the photo, as well, but I hesitate to describe these other things to you. I'd much rather go take another hit of LSD. JUST KIDDING ABOUT THAT. LOL
--Tommy :)
P.S. Re: The large head in the "virtual foreground". The guy's face resembles Tan Jacket Man or Jean Soutre or LHO.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 12, 2011, 10:27:12 PM by Thomas Graves »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 10:06:18 PM
|
Jr. Member
Posts: 92
|
Great work, Duncan! I see two men standing near the window. The guy on the right is wearing a white shirt and is looking down to his left and is standing a bit farther back than the other guy. The guy on the left is wearing a tan jacket and is looking down and is possibly holding a rifle vertically, with the butt of the rifle in front of his chest and the rifle goes straight down from there. Two shocks of hair from the top-front of his head are falling onto his forehead. The guy on the right is looking down to his left and looks like he has a receding hairline and long sideburns. What do you see, Duncan? --Tommy bumped; should be read in conjunction with my most recent post, directly above this one
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 12, 2011, 10:15:00 PM by Thomas Graves »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 10:06:55 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2355
Germany
|
with a little fantasy...  ...
-------------------------
-------------------------
"ich bin ein Berliner" As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login"There's none so blind as those who will not see."
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 10:12:43 PM
|
Jr. Member
Posts: 92
|
with a little fantasy... ... Question: Why would he be looking at that direction? Looking at TUM or someone else for the final go-ahead? --Tommy
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2011, 10:16:39 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2355
Germany
|
Question: Why would he be looking at that direction? Looking at TUM or someone else for the final go-ahead? --Tommy undoubtedly
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
