|
|
 September 13, 2011, 04:27:34 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 5253
|
Many interested parties on both sides of the debate often comment that "better" rifles were available ,But the main reason for settling on the Carcano was financially driven "Ossie was broke" .Not so according to C. A. Hamblen the night manager of the Western Union in Dallas according top Mr Hamblen
"Oswald" had recieved small cash amounts leading up to the assassination "10 maybe 20 dollars at a time .So there was really no need to economise
he could have shot the pres with a better class of rifle if he wanted.I can only assume he was "savin for Junes shoes".
-------------------------
-------------------------
Some things we know we know,the rest we have to find out for ourselves
One of the first things we found out was that the Warren Commission never pursued a conspiracy investigation.
Louis Stokes
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 06:36:57 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 8302
|
I have no idea where he got the ammo and clip. It's obvious that he got them somehow because
as you say, he needed them to get the job done.
Knowing where he bought them would be nice but not knowing
doesn't really mean anything. Surely this is obvious.
 So in a capital murder case involving the POTUS "he bought it somewhere" is good enough for you? What is obvious is you are here to distract as it is mandatory in an investigation to find out these things before you can charge someone! NOT knowing where he supposedly got the ammo and clip mens you *can't* rule out a conspiracy as someone could have gotten them for him.
-------------------------
-------------------------
A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. -- John F. Kennedy
"Benavides- Saw Oswald kill Tippit, picked him out of a lineup." - Brian "Doesn't Know His Rear From His Back" Walker
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 09:09:00 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9051
|
Many interested parties on both sides of the debate often comment that "better" rifles were available ,But the main reason for settling on the Carcano was financially driven "Ossie was broke" .Not so according to C. A. Hamblen the night manager of the Western Union in Dallas according top Mr Hamblen
"Oswald" had recieved small cash amounts leading up to the assassination "10 maybe 20 dollars at a time .So there was really no need to economise
he could have shot the pres with a better class of rifle if he wanted.I can only assume he was "savin for Junes shoes".
IF (and that's a big IF) Oswald was receiving "10 maybe 20 dollars at a time" leading up to the assassination, how does it relate the fact that he bought the Carcano eight months before the assassination? Was Oswald receiving "10 maybe 20 dollars at a time" back in January and February of 1963?
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 13, 2011, 09:15:09 PM by Bill Brown »
|
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 09:12:58 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9051
|
So in a capital murder case involving the POTUS "he bought it somewhere" is good enough for you? What is obvious is you are here to distract as it is mandatory in an investigation to find out these things before you can charge someone! NOT knowing where he supposedly got the ammo and clip mens you *can't* rule out a conspiracy as someone could have gotten them for him. This is further proof that conspirators were not framing Rob's favorite patsy, Lee Oswald. IF Lee was being set up, the conspirators would surely have created a trail linking Oswald to the purchase of the ammo.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 09:34:21 PM
|
Sr. Member
Posts: 432
|
So in a capital murder case involving the POTUS "he bought it somewhere" is good enough for you? What is obvious is you are here to distract as it is mandatory in an investigation to find out these things before you can charge someone!
NOT knowing where he supposedly got the ammo and clip mens you *can't* rule out a conspiracy as someone could have gotten them for him.
Since we know he bought the gun, and since Oz was kind enough to have a picture of himself taken with the gun, I'm not worried about where he bought the ammo for it if that information is just not available. I'm also willing to accept that someone may have gotten the ammo for him. But that could mean a lot of things and we have no way of determining the reality of any of them.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:18:51 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
Many interested parties on both sides of the debate often comment that "better" rifles were available ,But the main reason for settling on the Carcano was financially driven "Ossie was broke" .Not so according to C. A. Hamblen the night manager of the Western Union in Dallas according top Mr Hamblen
"Oswald" had recieved small cash amounts leading up to the assassination "10 maybe 20 dollars at a time .So there was really no need to economise
he could have shot the pres with a better class of rifle if he wanted.I can only assume he was "savin for Junes shoes".
You seem to have overlooked the fact that Oswald bought the rifle in late March.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:21:12 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
Many interested parties on both sides of the debate often comment that "better" rifles were available ,But the main reason for settling on the Carcano was financially driven "Ossie was broke" .Not so according to C. A. Hamblen the night manager of the Western Union in Dallas according top Mr Hamblen
"Oswald" had recieved small cash amounts leading up to the assassination "10 maybe 20 dollars at a time .So there was really no need to economise
he could have shot the pres with a better class of rifle if he wanted.I can only assume he was "savin for Junes shoes".
Hoax. Oswald was not receiving money via Western Union. BTW, he had left $179 with Marina and still had $13 in cash in his wallet when arrested. Enough for one week's expenses. Not enough for a plane to Russia.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:23:08 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
Just a thought but if Ossie has the Green why not walk into a gun shop and buy a $20 rifle ,Sorry my bad how could they then "trace " it to Oswald.
Its hard work thinking like an L/N you have to cut things out for it to work, is there a better manual than the Warren commission report?.Its written in English but its "All Greek" to many.
The clerk could recognize Oswald as the guy who bought it when the police tried to trace the rifle. Someone in the store might recognize him. Hosty was following him around and would see him buy the rifle.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:24:52 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
Was this the same for ideology the Minox?.
Was it even his Mixoc or did he just borrow Paine's?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:28:22 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
He was receiving money ($200.00 or more a month) from the FBI, so the story of him being broke is not correct.
The smart thing to do would have been to use a weapon he was more familiar with, and way better overall, like the M-1.
He would have NO need to work a bolt then.
No, you have absolutely nothing to support the idea that he was getting $200 per month from the FBI. The whole informant story was a hoax started by William Alexander to get revenge on the Feds.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:29:30 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
Can you please show me where he purchased the ammo and the clip for the rifle? I have not seen any evidence for these vital things yet, but as you said he needed to "get the job done".
Thanks!
No one knows. So what?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2011, 10:34:13 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6711
|
So in a capital murder case involving the POTUS "he bought it somewhere" is good enough for you? What is obvious is you are here to distract as it is mandatory in an investigation to find out these things before you can charge someone! NOT knowing where he supposedly got the ammo and clip mens you *can't* rule out a conspiracy as someone could have gotten them for him. No, it is not necessary. You can't prove where he bought the Imperial Reflex camera and how much he paid for it. So I guess that it means to you that he never owned it. Your thinking is childish. You know absolutely nothing about the rules of evidence. You make up stuff from your imagination and state them as facts. How about charging the guy who sold him the ammo with being part of the conspiracy? Maybe that's why no one wanted to come forward and admit selling Oswald the ammo.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
|
