HomeSubscribe Live FeedJFK Research Photo GalleryStoreJFK Youtube ChannelArticlesSearchLinksNotepadLoginRegister
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 11:06:38 PM
News:

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Backyard photo shadows  (Read 10060 times)

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2660


As you may all know Lee Harvey Oswald claimed to be not the man on the backyard photographs.

Oswald himself, when shown the photo in jail, claimed he had never seen it before and insisted someone had superimposed his head onto another body.

So far so good. David Von Pein gave me enough motivation to prove the following alleged lie of Lee Oswald:

20.) "That picture is not mine, but the face is mine. The picture has
been made by superimposing my face. The other part of the picture is
not me at all, and I have never seen this picture before. ... The small
picture was reduced from the larger one, made by some persons unknown
to me."

At first here one of three original photograph from the Warren Commission Report:
My reference.



Today i've worked on a simple 3d reconstruction of this photograph.

Sure, it's just a dummy but all important parts should be almost accurate.

I used the original specs of Lee H. Oswald as best as possible. The height is correct, the nose size is correct and also
the ears (little mug ears) angle will be the same of him.

Following the shadow in the reference picture you will see, the shadows in my reconstrucion fails as it's best in particular at the nose and his right ear obviously.




I used then a sun position which shows, how a casting shadow will be seen just from his face shadows only.

Here you go:



As you see the shadow on the ground won't fit at all.

If you doubt my work i will offer this simple 3 model for free to explore it by yourself and prove it.
If you are not in this position to got a 3d application or you have not the ability to do it, i recommend the
following one:

If you live in Dallas/Texas...wait until approx. March mid/end at 12:45 am, when the sun will be high enough and take a photograph from a person whom fit's the
specs of L.H.O at a similar shadow regarded position.
You will face the same problems i have here to fit all shadows. For sure.
You can take me by my word.
Prove it and show it.

My 3d app is able to create physics to 100% without a doubt.

I can say now this photographs are altered.
This not an opinion....this is a fact.

This is what Lee said... a fake.

My conclusion is a man with a similar body shape posed at this position in Oswalds backyard and his face was cutout
and replaced with Oswalds face, right above his chin.

Who has got the power to do, who made it?

Martin 



-------------------------
« Last Edit: March 12, 2009, 12:24:39 AM by Martin Hinrichs »

-------------------------
Firework As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

God bless Emmett Till:
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Insipired by the Movie "Invictus" and Nelson Mandela.
What a poem!

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 9051


Marina admitted to taking the photographs.


-------------------------

-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers

"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather

"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 1417


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As you may all know Lee Harvey Oswald claimed to be not the man on the backyard photographs.

If you were a crime investigator you would be grinning from ear to ear finding this (I believe there were 3 found altogether?) - in the one photo you have all the evidence you could wish for - Rifle, Gun, "subversive" literature, and a smug look. All that was missing was a hand held sign saying "JFK - your next!"   dance;

Either Oswald WANTED to get "caught" BADLY or something doesn't add up here. Why would he pose for such a photo? History? Didn't Oswald work in photography as well? If these photos were "faked" how did they end up where they were found?  shock2

cheers,

Tony


-------------------------

-------------------------
Representative FORD - The window that you saw the man that you describe was on what end of the building?
Mr. ROWLAND - The west, southwest corner.
Representative FORD - And the man you saw hanging out from the window was at what corner?
Mr. ROWLAND - The east, southeast corner.

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2660


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Marina admitted to taking the photographs.

Yes, and she lied because of pressure from the WC staff.

Tony, yes this fake photos raises many more new questions.

Martin


-------------------------
« Last Edit: March 07, 2009, 02:14:03 PM by Martin Hinrichs »

   ReplyReply
Group: Guest

Excellent work Martin...


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 610

What happened that day?


Great work Martin mate, this one turned up in the DPD files in the nineties



-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Group: Guest

"I asked him then why he had dressed himself up like that, with the rifle and the pistol, and I thought that he had gone crazy, and he said he wanted to send that to a newspaper. This was not my business--it was a man's business." Marina - testimony to the Warren Commission. 

Marina also showed one of the pics to Lee's mother the night of the assassination at the Paines. what is in the pics that makes a difference after knowing Lee made Marina shoot them? unless you don't believe her?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2660


David &Ian, thank you mates.  fly;

For those of you, who want to reproduce that scene in real life and you live in Dallas/Texas (John)
i will you give you further informations regarding the sun position.

The first day this year, when the sun will be high enough for this purpose is march 18.
From that day on you have the chance to it twice a day.

You see in the second attachement a scenario on march 21.
A first attempt can be done at 11:47am and in this particular case the camera (south) and the camera target (north) is a perfect north-south axis.
The second attempt can be done at 13:00pm. But here you have to change the position of the target (person) to match the shadow of the backyard photo on the ground.

The last attachement shows an example of april 15.
As you see, the time gap increased which is natural.

3 important points:

1.) There is no need to do that photograph at 214 W Neely, Texas.
2.) Make sure this photopraph will be taken on a flat surface.
3.) Make sure the person you photopraph fits the body shape of Oswald approximately.
     a height of 5 '/10", the nose and ear angle is (little mug ears) important.

And the posing of Oswald in that image should be reproduced by this person (not easy).

For everybody here whom not lived in Dallas, please tell me your location and i will tell you
the date and time that you can reproduce this case.

I hope to see some photographs!

Martin

Edit: You have add 1 hour to all times because there is now "daylight saving time" in most parts of the USA. Dallas too.


-------------------------
« Last Edit: March 12, 2009, 12:29:27 AM by Martin Hinrichs »

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2660


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"I asked him then why he had dressed himself up like that, with the rifle and the pistol, and I thought that he had gone crazy, and he said he wanted to send that to a newspaper. This was not my business--it was a man's business." Marina - testimony to the Warren Commission. 

Marina also showed one of the pics to Lee's mother the night of the assassination at the Paines. what is in the pics that makes a difference after knowing Lee made Marina shoot them? unless you don't believe her?

John, i do not want to tell her a liar.
But obviously she didn't told the truth.

At first it was one photograph, then two and later 3.
And at first she said, she made the photo from the stairs.

After the WC staff had set her under pressure poor Marina have been told what to say.
This images are fabrications. 

And also remember there was a fourth pose in Marina's possession.  She showed it to Marguerite the day after the assassination and they decided to destroy it.  Marina tore it up and flushed it down the toilet.  Allegedly.

But hey, there is also a fifths  photograph found.
It shows the backyard without Oswald, highlikely taken the same day within minutes.
The same shadows, the same stuff arranged in that area.

Can someone declare, for what purpose Marina should have done this?  huh

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Martin




-------------------------
« Last Edit: March 09, 2009, 01:26:46 AM by Martin Hinrichs »

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 1417


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"I asked him then why he had dressed himself up like that, with the rifle and the pistol, and I thought that he had gone crazy, and he said he wanted to send that to a newspaper. This was not my business--it was a man's business." Marina - testimony to the Warren Commission. 

Marina also showed one of the pics to Lee's mother the night of the assassination at the Paines. what is in the pics that makes a difference after knowing Lee made Marina shoot them? unless you don't believe her?

John, i do not want to tell her a liar.
But obviously she didn't told the truth.

At first it was one photograph, then two and later 3.
And at first she said, she made the photo from the stairs.

After the WC staff had set her under pressure poor Marina have been told what to say.
This images are fabrications. 

And also remember there was a fourth pose in Marina's possession.  She showed it to Marguerite the day after the assassination and they decided to destroy it.  Marina tore it up and flushed it down the toilet.  Allegedly.

But hey, there is also a fifths  photograph found.
It shows the backyard without Oswald, highlikely taken the same day within minutes.
The same shadows, the same stuff arranged in that area.

Can someone declare, for what purpose Marina should have done this?  huh

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Martin




What is the origin of this photo without Lee in it?  :o


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2660


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

What is the origin of this photo without Lee in it?  :o

Tony, a scan of Robert Grodens book "A killing of president!
Robert is one of my hero.
I hope to meet him in DP at some point.

Martin


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 1417


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

What is the origin of this photo without Lee in it?  :o

Tony, a scan of Robert Grodens book "A killing of president!
Robert is one of my hero.
I hope to meet him in DP at some point.

Martin

Why would Marina take a photo of an empty backyard? Practice? In 1963, was there available technology to manipulate photos - that is to insert a figure into a background and make it believable?

What puzzles me is if the photo was faked, how did George de Mohrenschildt end up with a copy?

Is there anything "straightforward" in the JFK assassination?

cheers,

Tony


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Gallery

JFKForum.com

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines