JFK Assassination Forum 
Logo
HomeThe Robin Unger JFK Assassination GalleryYoutube JFK Assassination Video ChannelSearchNotepadLoginRegister

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 29, 2017, 03:09:19 AM
News: Posts and threads containing swear words, personal insults or crudities, content considered by Admin to be spamming, when reported or observed, may be edited or deleted.
The perpetrator of any offense may receive a posting suspension of a period to be determined by Admin in relation to the considered severity of the offense.
Questions relating to deletions or edits will not be answered by Admin via any communication method here or elsewhere.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9
Jim Garrison was accused of Child Molesting!  (Read 12356 times)

Super Member
*****

Posts: 22198


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I really didn't expect the LN's here to stoop to these depths. ahxx       Thank you Miles for taking them on on this garbage.   
Stoop to what depths exactly?

The depths that CTs stoop to on a regular basis when they accuse people like, say, JD Tippit of being in on the conspiracy.

The depths that LNers stoop to on a regular basis when they accuse LHO of killing two people all alone with NO supporting evidence.

When comparing the accusation by many CT's of Tippit's supposed involvement to that of LNers constantly accusing Oswald, there is way more evidence suggesting that Oswald had at least something to do with the assassination than there is that Tippit was involved in any way whatsoever.  To say that the likelihood of the two fellows being involved is comparable, is laughable.

Yet when asked to cite this "evidence" you never do.  How come? 


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 22198


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It would seem quite a few WC supporters learned this trick from this event as the term "child molester" is often bandied about on ACJ against CTers.

It is a sick, vile thing and it should never be used against anyone on a boards like these.  As I have said before, IF you have to stooped to this level you have already lost the debate (of course with quite a few WC supporters there is NO debate anyway, but rather only personal attacks and slander).

Why would you even post this topic Mike?

Why are no other LNers having a problem with this kind of post? 



Rob,
I have never and would never call a CTer that.  I really found this to be interesting.  I think it is worthy of discussion.

Unless you can post solid evidence showing Garrison was a child molester this is NOT worthy of discussion.  All you are doing by saying this with NO supporting evidence is slandering him, and by association all CTers, and that is your goal. 

Luckily, this shows more about your character than ours.

Character???  roflmao.

Exactly Jason/YoHarvey/Annmarie/Spiffy one, etc...YOU have NO character! 


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 22198


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Ross

Do you have Garrisons rap sheet?.( and move your face away from Mike a bit your getting sunburnt)

Ian

No I don't.

Big Jim had a most unfortunate facial appearance when he was under pressure. A sort of wild-eyed , bug-eyed look. You must have seen JFK documentaries where he appeared?

Poor Clay Shaw ...
... Garrison seemed to have picked his name out of a hat.





LOL!  Once again we see Ross has no knowledge of anything related to this case or he is  to cover for "poor old Clay Shaw!"  Shaw  while under oath as he said he had NO ties to the CIA and it was shown later on he did!  There was nothing innocent about Shaw, albeit, he was a on the lower level of things.

Caprio makes no distinction between assets and agents.  Anybody shocked? 

May thinks ONLY agents do dirty work!  Anybody shocked?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 17103


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I really didn't expect the LN's here to stoop to these depths. ahxx       Thank you Miles for taking them on on this garbage.   
Stoop to what depths exactly?

The depths that CTs stoop to on a regular basis when they accuse people like, say, JD Tippit of being in on the conspiracy.

The depths that LNers stoop to on a regular basis when they accuse LHO of killing two people all alone with NO supporting evidence.

When comparing the accusation by many CT's of Tippit's supposed involvement to that of LNers constantly accusing Oswald, there is way more evidence suggesting that Oswald had at least something to do with the assassination than there is that Tippit was involved in any way whatsoever.  To say that the likelihood of the two fellows being involved is comparable, is laughable.

Yet when asked to cite this "evidence" you never do.  How come? 

Not true.  Have a read back through my posts in this forum.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 7014


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Ross

Do you have Garrisons rap sheet?.( and move your face away from Mike a bit your getting sunburnt)

Ian

No I don't.

Big Jim had a most unfortunate facial appearance when he was under pressure. A sort of wild-eyed , bug-eyed look. You must have seen JFK documentaries where he appeared?

Poor Clay Shaw ...
... Garrison seemed to have picked his name out of a hat.





LOL!  Once again we see Ross has no knowledge of anything related to this case or he is  to cover for "poor old Clay Shaw!"  Shaw  while under oath as he said he had NO ties to the CIA and it was shown later on he did!  There was nothing innocent about Shaw, albeit, he was a on the lower level of things.

Caprio makes no distinction between assets and agents.  Anybody shocked? 

May thinks ONLY agents do dirty work!  Anybody shocked?

We're only shocked by your continual stupidity, thanx for asking.  Clay Shaw had been a part-time contact of the Domestic Contact Service of the CIA, where Shaw volunteered information from his travels abroad, mostly to Latin America.   By the mid-1970s, 150,000 Americans (businessmen, journalists, etc.) had provided such information to the DCS.  So, Caprio is now stating this vast conspiracy MAY have included an additional 150,000 more people.  Damn conspiracy just keeps on growing.   rofl   rofl



-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 11486


Unlike Caprios IQ.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 9894


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

 conspiracy just keeps on growing.   rofl   rofl


BS

No. The conspiract stays stead state. Everybody knows this. Does shrink, doesn't grow.

Why?

Because it happened in the past.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2093

Facts support your ideas, insults degrade them.


Tom,
           Very informative. It seems some forget everyone has right to face their accusers while alive, not post-humously so they cannot respond. It reminds me a bit of the fact checking at Rolling Stone or Fox News of late. They report the "facts" from anonymous or unproven sources then make a retraction quietly or just never do so, and hope others will forget after the damage is done. Cursed are the myth makers for they waste the world's time.

I once heard from an anonymous source that anonymous sources are not reliable.


-------------------------
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 08:21:54 AM by Carmine Savastano »

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Forum Assassination of JFK discussion and debate surrounding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy In Dealey Plaza Texas on November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Photographs Gallery

JFK Assassination Forum Assassination of JFK discussion and debate surrounding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy In Dealey Plaza Texas on November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines