|
|
 March 09, 2011, 03:43:00 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3611
|
Making it clear that they will say anything, or do anything to try and keep their fantasy alive, CT on this board have said some things that have made us all scratch our heads really hard. Feel free to add, and I am sure the list will grow in the future.
1- David Sellers trying to hint that Oswald couldn't do the shooting, because the fact that he couldn't drive a car is proof he didn't have good hand eye coordination.
2- Tony posting that proof that Oswald went to work with his wedding ring on 11/22/63, is the fact that Frazier didn't ask him why he wasn't wearing his wedding ring. A few things wrong with this Gem right off the bat. 1- Anyone who has ever lived knows that you rarely notice if someone is wearing a ring, unless you want to ask them out. 2- Frazier barely knew Oswald, so I don't think he would ask him even if he did notice, and even if he happened to notice before 11/22 that Oswald wore a ring. 3- If Frazier noticed the ring and asked Oswald. why hasn't he told anyone in 47 years. I am sure he knows the evidence to the case.
3- Tony saying the fact that nobody claimed to be with Oswald during the assasination, is not proof that nobody was with Oswald, because maybe he was sitting with some black guys but they were threatened to not say anything.
4- Herbert saying Curry was a back of the head witnsses, because he found an audio of Curry saying that maybe a shot came from the front because of the way JFK's head reacted when hit, and because of the blood spatter.
He can't tell you anything aboiut this audio, it could be Curry opinion after reading a conspiracy book, because he sure didn't see it. But Herbert in his desperate quest to find a Dealey Plaza back of the head witnsses, tried to force this square peg in our round hole. And even if the Curry thing took, say nobody here had an IQ above 70, then it would be everyone else in Dealey who saw it vs Curry. I guess this would be proof to Herbert that the back of Oswald's head opened up.
-------------------------
-------------------------
What is silly is thinking that two turns that reduced the speed of the car to 8-11 m.p.h. is no big deal when motorcades are suppose to keep a 44 m.p.h. speed..R Caprio
LHO had poor hand-eye coordination and proof of this is seen in the fact he couldn't drive an automobile-- R Caprio
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 03:47:57 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
Making it clear that they will say anything, or do anything to try and keep their fantasy alive, CT on this board have said some things that have made us all scratch our heads really hard. Feel free to add, and I am sure the list will grow in the future.
1- David Sellers trying to hint that Oswald couldn't do the shooting, because the fact that he couldn't drive a car is proof he didn't have good hand eye coordination.
2- Tony posting that proof that Oswald went to work with his wedding ring on 11/22/63, is the fact that Frazier didn't ask him why he wasn't wearing his wedding ring. A few things wrong with this Gem right off the bat. 1- Anyone who has ever lived knows that you rarely notice if someone is wearing a ring, unless you want to ask them out. 2- Frazier barely knew Oswald, so I don't think he would ask him even if he did notice, and even if he happened to notice before 11/22 that Oswald wore a ring. 3- If Frazier noticed the ring and asked Oswald. why hasn't he told anyone in 47 years. I am sure he knows the evidence to the case.
3- Tony saying the fact that nobody claimed to be with Oswald during the assasination, is not proof that nobody was with Oswald, because maybe he was sitting with some black guys but they were threatened to not say anything.
4- Herbert saying Curry was a back of the head witnsses, because he found an audio of Curry saying that maybe a shot came from the front because of the way JFK's head reacted when hit, and because of the blood spatter.
He can't tell you anything aboiut this audio, it could be Curry opinion after reading a conspiracy book, because he sure didn't see it. But Herbert in his desperate quest to find a Dealey Plaza back of the head witnsses, tried to force this square peg in our round hole. And even if the Curry thing took, say nobody here had an IQ above 70, then it would be everyone else in Dealey who saw it vs Curry. I guess this would be proof to Herbert that the back of Oswald's head opened up.
HAHAHAHA we bumped heads....Ill delete mine and add to yours!
-------------------------
-------------------------
Marsh can not even comprehend a simple time stamp. How will he ever comprehend the evidence?
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 03:48:46 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
Making it clear that they will say anything, or do anything to try and keep their fantasy alive, CT on this board have said some things that have made us all scratch our heads really hard. Feel free to add, and I am sure the list will grow in the future.
1- David Sellers trying to hint that Oswald couldn't do the shooting, because the fact that he couldn't drive a car is proof he didn't have good hand eye coordination.
2- Tony posting that proof that Oswald went to work with his wedding ring on 11/22/63, is the fact that Frazier didn't ask him why he wasn't wearing his wedding ring. A few things wrong with this Gem right off the bat. 1- Anyone who has ever lived knows that you rarely notice if someone is wearing a ring, unless you want to ask them out. 2- Frazier barely knew Oswald, so I don't think he would ask him even if he did notice, and even if he happened to notice before 11/22 that Oswald wore a ring. 3- If Frazier noticed the ring and asked Oswald. why hasn't he told anyone in 47 years. I am sure he knows the evidence to the case.
3- Tony saying the fact that nobody claimed to be with Oswald during the assasination, is not proof that nobody was with Oswald, because maybe he was sitting with some black guys but they were threatened to not say anything.
4- Herbert saying Curry was a back of the head witnsses, because he found an audio of Curry saying that maybe a shot came from the front because of the way JFK's head reacted when hit, and because of the blood spatter.
He can't tell you anything aboiut this audio, it could be Curry opinion after reading a conspiracy book, because he sure didn't see it. But Herbert in his desperate quest to find a Dealey Plaza back of the head witnsses, tried to force this square peg in our round hole. And even if the Curry thing took, say nobody here had an IQ above 70, then it would be everyone else in Dealey who saw it vs Curry. I guess this would be proof to Herbert that the back of Oswald's head opened up.
One of my favorites, is Robert Harris telling me the facts of the case are clear, and do not need to be proven. He offered the following in reference: "Its like asking me to prove the limo was black" I had to remind him, the Limo was in fact blue. Another was when Harris was yammering on about his Dal Tex shooter carrying a weapon into the building assembling it, and using a silencer to shoot with. By the time the smoke cleared, and I dispelled his ideas about a silencer being used he claimed the following: "The weapon was neither a pistol, nor a rifle." Yet it had to be assembled, and used a silencer, by his own theory. What was it, a blowgun? Another is Pat Speer and his adamant contention that the scope was misaligned during the assassination, even in the face of the Frazier testimony that clearly stated: "Representative BOGGS - Excuse me just a moment. Do you have any opinion on whether or not the sight was deliberately set that way? Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; I do not. And I think I must say here that this mount was loose on the rifle when we received it. And apparently the scope had even been taken off of the rifle, in searching for fingerprints on the rifle. So that actually the way it was sighted-in when we got it does not necessarily mean it was sighted-in that way when it was abandoned."Herbert Blenner and his contention that there was no hemo/pneumothorax condition is quickly rising to the top as well. Clearly this condition existed as is evident in the statements of the doctors. Even as the doctors state clearly this was caused by a passing bullet, or the pressure caused by a passing bullet. What will they come up with next?
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 09, 2011, 03:51:27 AM by Mike Williams »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 04:03:43 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2338
|
Robert Harris said that Jackie didn't climb over the seat and out on to the trunk lid after the head shot.
A rocket propelled paralyzing dart was fired by TUM. ( I don't recall who first said that, probably it doesn't originate within a thread on this forum)
Robert Harris again. He claims that the first shot was fired as the car turned on to Elm St. And that the shot struck the pavement beside the car. JFK holds his hand up to shield himself from the spray of debris from this shot.
The zapruder film has been altered.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 09, 2011, 04:05:22 AM by Geoff Nis »
|
-------------------------
"you're the cop, you figure it out"
-Lee H. Oswald to Dallas Police detectives, weekend
of 11-22-63.
"Part of the reason why we avoided talking about this thing, because every time you say something, somebody misinterprets what you say."
-James. J. Humes, excerpt of ARRB statement, 2-13-96
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 04:11:55 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3611
|
Robert Harris said that Jackie didn't climb over the seat and out on to the trunk lid after the head shot.
A rocket propelled paralyzing dart was fired by TUM. ( I don't recall who first said that, probably it doesn't originate within a thread on this forum)
Robert Harris again. He claims that the first shot was fired as the car turned on to Elm St. And that the shot struck the pavement beside the car. JFK holds his hand up to shield himself from the spray of debris from this shot.
The zapruder film has been altered.
The greatest thing about the dart from the umbrella is the fact that the nuts have been arguing for 4 plus decades that a marine couldn't hit a shot from 88 yards with a rifle, but they have no problem believing that a guy was able to hit JFK with an umbrella. Always funny to me.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 04:13:56 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3611
|
Oh yes I forgot another Gem.
David Healey referring to JFK as John Frances Kennedy, as he berated someone for not knowing the simplest facts of the case.
That was an all time screamer!
And who was it that even had some moronic theory about Zapruder being a rubber doll?
Oh yes, and the claims of Gary Craig that Oswald was a poor shot! Another hoot!
I have a feeling this is gonna be a long long thread....
When asked what was in the big taped together package that Oswald brought to work that day if not a rifle. two people said his lunch. Ian being one of them.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 04:25:42 AM
|
Sr. Member
Posts: 333
|
My all-time favorite has to be Danny Stracener (sp?) who insisted on more than one occasion that Ruby shooting Oswald was a "staged Hollywood stunt." Another time he said that Kennedy wore a hairpiece. I also have to laugh when I see the Zapruder film referred to as the "Zaptoon."
Another howler: Miles Scull finding no trace of LBJ in a motorcade photo and concluding that he was "ducking" in order to avoid getting hit with bullets, despite the fact that if he were in on it, he would presumably have nothing to fear, as he wouldn't be a target. Of course, Duncan MacRae posted a version of the photo which brought Johnson out of the shadows, but that only made MS fight and defend his position even harder.
Oh, and how about Robert Morrow posting his long, rambling, contradictory nonsense about how LBJ killed JFK because the Kennedy family was going to expose him in "Life" magazine?
This is fun.
-------------------------
-------------------------
“the greatest enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-deliberate, contrived and dishonest-but the myth-persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.”-John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 06:25:00 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9048
|
Be careful, guys. We ALL make mistakes.
-------------------------
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 09, 2011, 06:52:11 AM
|
Full Member
Posts: 219
|
My favorite:
All of those witnesses who saw a man in the TSBD window with a rifle said he was wearing a white shirt with open collar or light colored clothing. Oswald wore a brown shirt.
-------------------------
-------------------------
Mike Williams"Earthworms get on my driveway when it rains"
Robert Harris"Take a broom and sweep them back into the grass"
Bill Brown"But that will hurt them"
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
