How soon you forget.
In the OP, you said:
if you lean towards a conspiracy and Oswald was the patsy, then this transcript demonstrates how far up the ladder it went.
I pointed out that this statement is just a load of circular reasoning.
And you expressed incredulity:
That's a lot to know and do less than a day later. WTF?
Which isn't that hard to believe when you realize that, by the time of the call, a small army of investigators had been employed in the investigation. The FBI, Secret Service, Dallas Police, Dallas County Sherriffs Department, USPS, and any number of other agencies had assigned every investigator that they could to the case.
Your response was to change the subject by launching into a classic Gish Gallop, and when called out on that, you fell back on some cheese-boy sarcasm. And here we are.
Relax Squidly. Unlike you, I know the difference between proof and evidence. We are all just spit-balling here except for your unsupported naïve claim:
"Which isn't that hard to believe when you realize that, by the time of the call, a small army of investigators had been employed in the investigation. The FBI, Secret Service, Dallas Police, Dallas County Sherriffs Department, USPS, and any number of other agencies had assigned every investigator that they could to the case."I gave you examples of how incompetent and corrupt the investigators were, which rationalized my doubt they were able to apprehend Oswald within an hour and know so much about him within 24 hrs. Then you opined that it wasn't that hard for you to believe, which you thought somehow scored you some points and destroyed my argument. HA! You didn't even follow my argument.
Funny how a LNer tells me that I'm using circular reasoning, yet has no concept of logical fallacy. But I get it, you LNers have wasted years defending the conspirators to advance your delusional LN theory. In for a penny I suppose. I'm sure the conspirators appreciate it, if any are still alive. Sucker.