JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963

Jim DiEugenio Insights (Read 1511 times)

Topic Options

Miles Scull

September 11, 2010, 08:11:13 PM

Super Member

Posts: 8748

Members might be interested in some cutting edge research, pro & con, found on another forum.

This is a compendium of critical issues which are also debated here on this forum. warrenxx

See:

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

-------------------------

Reply

Brian Walker

September 17, 2010, 07:30:25 PM

Super Member

Posts: 3611

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Evidence of a WC cover-up===What about the drawings printed in the WC. The back wound is in the back at the level of the 3rd thoracic vertebra right where JFK's clothes show it to be, right where the autopsy drawing and photograph shows it to be, it's where Dr Berkely said it was, and where FBI's Seibert & O'Neill report said Humes probed it and it was deemed to not have penetrated more than a couple of inches.

Yet, the WC's own drawing shows the back wound to be in the cervical area---the back of JFK's "Neck," in fact Ford changed the name "Back" wound to "Neck" wound.

How is this "Lie" explained by LN'ers

Who did these drawings? Just a question.

-------------------------

-------------------------

What is silly is thinking that two turns that reduced the speed of the car to 8-11 m.p.h. is no big deal when motorcades are suppose to keep a 44 m.p.h. speed..R Caprio

LHO had poor hand-eye coordination and proof of this is seen in the fact he couldn't drive an automobile-- R Caprio

Reply

Brian Walker

September 17, 2010, 07:57:32 PM

Super Member

Posts: 3611

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I thought the same thing, and like Frankie says:
Send him a biography and a picture he will register you.

Why does he need a biography? Is he really trying to weed out the fools. Does he notice that clowns like Fetzner are on there for God's sake. This is the guy who last week on the history channel said the debris from the plane that crashed into Penn on 9/11 left a debris field of over 4 miles. Then experts they taked to had to explain that it is only 4 miles if you take the roads. They had to remind the weak minded like Fetzner that plane debris doesn't usually take roads. And that maybe mapquest is not the best place to figure something like this out.

-------------------------

Reply

Mark Henceroth

September 18, 2010, 12:42:17 AM

Super Member

Posts: 3791

Well, somebody did it.

Its not like a biography of your life, just your hometown and type of occupation is all I gave.

-------------------------

-------------------------

LN; So how did it happen then ?

CT; I don't know, I only know that it didn't happen the way the evidence says.

LN; We should not use evidence in this case ?

CT; Correct.

Reply

Michael Obryan

September 18, 2010, 03:45:37 AM

Full Member

Posts: 245

RE: Mr. Walker, the drawings were done by a Naval artist who received a commendation for his efforts.

The drawings were not done from pictures, but, at the direction of Commander Humes, which makes the whole scenario even more dubious.

-------------------------

Reply

Ian Kingsbury

September 18, 2010, 05:09:09 PM

Super Member

Posts: 5248

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Who did these drawings? Just a question.

This is basic stuff you really ought to know why they used drawings when the pictures were available
Why dont you go and have a look for yourself .Because if we tell you we will probably be lying or mistaken!.

-------------------------

-------------------------

Some things we know we know,the rest we have to find out for ourselves

One of the first things we found out was that the Warren Commission never pursued a conspiracy investigation.
Louis Stokes

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room

Reply

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.