|
|
 September 02, 2010, 09:56:29 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 8744
|
A special treat. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login 
-------------------------
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
 leefarley |
September 06, 2010, 11:56:20 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
Is Brian Walker asking silly-assed questions on this thread because he has no idea where to begin in answering the questions I left for him on his own thread re: the Walker bullet? He has no clue. An  who calls others idiots. A who calls others morons. A nut who calls others nuts. A complete basket case. Let us know when you have some answers to the questions I asked, Brian? I'm sure one day you'll give us a valid reason why J. Walton Moore left a psycho on the streets after he was informed he had shot at Walker? I have been through this with Lee before. Lee where is your proof that Walker said that Oswald didn't shot at him. You claimed that, I have asked 3 or 4 times now. Nothing. I guess i will get that answer about the same time Miles gives me a list of Doctors who said that JFK had an extrance wound in the right temple. Still waiting. Christ almighty! Does your stupidity know no bounds? It's like conversing with an empty plastic bag. Yes, you've now asked me three times but because you have the reading comprehension of a elderly chimpanzee you've missed the first two times I've answered it for you. Do I really have to lower my own level of intelligence down to yours before you understand or are you simply clinging to this question to hide the fact that you have no clue what I was asking you on your own idiotic thread? I'll tell you what I'll do Brian, I'll answer your question like a five year old. Walker didn't say that Oswald didn't shoot at him. I did write that he "told" us but was simply suggesting that this is what his testimony "said.". In other words, he told us without telling us. I apologise for using language conventions that went way over your head. There, you've asked three times, I've answered it three times. Would you now like to answer my questions just once? We wouldn't want you to prove what everyone already thinks on this forum. That you are not only clueless but also worthless. Christ. Show us the testimony where Walker was suggesting that Oswald couldn't have shot at him. 3 days now. For gods sake show us that part of the testimony that says what you claim. The clowning around continues, eh Brian? The man who knows nothing once again asks others to do his homework for him because he can't comprehend or understand the evidence in the Walker shooting. You are such a waste of space that I don’t know why I’m even bothering but this will answer your question, whether it is to your satisfaction or not is another matter, and you being the thick dunderhead that you are it will more than likely go over your pea sized brain. Turn to page two of Walker's testimony in Volume XI of the Warren Commission hearings and testimony. Yep, page two. You’ve obviously struggled to even read the testimony beyond two pages: General Walker. … As I crossed a window coming downstairs in front, I saw a car at the bottom of the church alley just making a turn onto Turtle Creek. The car was unidentifiable. I could see the two back lights, and you have to look through the trees there, and I could see it moving out. This car would have been about at the right time for anybody that was making a getaway.So what are you going to do Brain-of-the-century? Admit that Oswald could drive and had access to a car? Or admit to a conspiracy in the attempted assassination of General Edwin Walker? As far as any reasonable person is concerned you are on dodgy ground if you want to claim that Oswald was a lone-nut in this attempted assassination: Mr. LIEBELER. Now, I understand that Mr. Surrey saw two men in the vicinity of your house shortly before April 10, 1963, acting in a manner that he regarded as suspicious. Did he report that to you at or about that time?General WALKER. He has reported that to me, and I don’t remember the date on which he did.The HSCA in its findings printed this: Police located a 14-year-old boy in Walker’s neighborhood who said that after hearing the shot, he climbed a fence and looked into an alley to the rear of Walker’s home. The boy said he then saw some men speeding down the alley in a light green or light blue Ford, either a 1959 or 1960 model. He said he also saw another car, a 1958 Chevrolet, black with white down the side, in a church parking lot adjacent to Walker’s house. The car door was open, and a man was bending over the back seat, as though he was placing something on the floor of the car. So what are you going to do Brain? Admit conspiracy? Or bury your head in the sand and believe in the unbelievable? Most people who understand the evidence (that doesn’t include you) actually know that there is something suspiciously absent from General Walker’s testimony. They never asked him about CE 573. He was questioned for two hours and not once did Wesley Liebeler ask him about the bullet that he held in his hands and had “slivers of the jacket shell” on his desk. Not one question. It doesn’t raise any alarm bells for you because you are an indoctrinated but for the rest of us we know why he wasn’t asked about CE573. From Breach of Trust by Gerald McKnight p. 49: The Commission relied heavily on Frazier’s testimony to tie Oswald’s rifle to the Kennedy assassination. Just before he concluded his March 31st Commission testimony Frazier was asked about the Walker bullet (FBI designated Q-188). Commission assistant counsel Melvin A Eisenberg asked whether Q-188 could have been fired from Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano. According to Frazier, the Walker slug was a 6.5mm copper jacketed bullet, but because of its distorted condition he could not answer conclusively. In other words he either guessed [wrongly] or he lied because [returning to McKnight p.49-50]: What Eisenberg carefully avoided and Frazier did not volunteer were the results of the FBI’s spectrographic analysis of Q-188. A week before Frazier appeared before the Commission, Eisenberg met with him and Agent Henry H. Heilberger to review the FBI lab results. …Heilberger concluded in his report (PC78378) that the lead alloy in the Walker bullet was different from the lead alloy of the two large bullet fragments recovered from under the left jump seat presidential limousine.So what did the FBI do, Brian? Well, it’s a no-brainer, they suppressed the record of Heliberger’s results. So what did the Warren Commission do, Brian? Well, another no-brainer, they didn’t call Heilberger as a witness. Clap, clap, clap… As a final gesture I will ask you to look at what happened when Robert Blakey introduced CE573 into evidence at the HSCA. Walker wrote to Blakey and point blank told him that the bullet that the HSCA was entering was NOT the bullet he examined at his home in Turtle Creek. Walker mounted a campaign to have the bullet “withdrawn” and he described it as a “substitute.” His plea fell on deaf ears and CE573 is the “substitute” that is now in the National Archives. Would you care to answer my questions now Brian? I’m not holding my breath because I know you are so clueless you don’t know what half of them were about but I do know what type of reply I’m going to get from what I’ve written above. A clueless one…
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 06, 2010, 07:17:01 PM by Lee Farley »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
frankie vegas |
September 07, 2010, 03:58:49 PM
|
Group: Guest
|
XI page 426 General WALKER. He called me the morning of November 23, 1963, about 7 a.m. Mr. LIEBELER. That is when you gave him this information about Oswald having attacked you? General WALKER. I didn't give him all the information--I think the portion you are referring to, I didn't give him, because I had no way of knowing that Oswald attacked me. I still don't. And I am not very prone to say in fact he did. In fact, I have always claimed he did not, until we can get into the case or somebody tells us differently that he did. Mr. LIEBELER. Do you have a record here that indicates when you were in Shreveport ? General WALKER. I don't know that I have a record here. I can tell you definitely when I was in Shreveport . As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 07, 2010, 05:48:33 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 5244
|
If the story of a lone nut taking at shot at a national hero (Oswald at Walker) got printed even in the remotest place in America this would have blown the whole assasination .Do not forget they had taken the time to remove the Oswald flash warning. This if discovered during any decent investigation would have indicated that something was amiss.So even if Oswald had taken a shot at Walker Somebody would have covered it up!?!?. It was just another of those tales to put a weapon in Oswalds hands and to show intent.Like Yates story,Like the MC boxes being found. Hell they could not even get the ammo right.I believe there were 2 rifles found in the TSBD either could have been used to link to a patsy. and when I say Patsy I mean Living or dead .Both rifles have the caliber on the barrel and other information I gather that the police who found it could read?. This why some of the Carcano's imported to America had to be worked on before export licenses could be issued.
-------------------------
-------------------------
Some things we know we know,the rest we have to find out for ourselves
One of the first things we found out was that the Warren Commission never pursued a conspiracy investigation.
Louis Stokes
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 11, 2010, 07:28:48 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 8744
|
If the story of a lone nut taking at shot at a national hero (Oswald at Walker) got printed even in the remotest place in America this would have blown the whole assasination .Do not forget they had taken the time to remove the Oswald flash warning. This if discovered during any decent investigation would have indicated that something was amiss.So even if Oswald had taken a shot at Walker Somebody would have covered it up!?!?. It was just another of those tales to put a weapon in Oswalds hands and to show intent.Like Yates story,Like the MC boxes being found. Hell they could not even get the ammo right.I believe there were 2 rifles found in the TSBD either could have been used to link to a patsy. and when I say Patsy I mean Living or dead .Both rifles have the caliber on the barrel and other information I gather that the police who found it could read?. This why some of the Carcano's imported to America had to be worked on before export licenses could be issued.
Like Yates storyJust so.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 12, 2010, 06:43:59 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 5244
|
If the story of a lone nut taking at shot at a national hero (Oswald at Walker) got printed even in the remotest place in America this would have blown the whole assasination .Do not forget they had taken the time to remove the Oswald flash warning. This if discovered during any decent investigation would have indicated that something was amiss.So even if Oswald had taken a shot at Walker Somebody would have covered it up!?!?. It was just another of those tales to put a weapon in Oswalds hands and to show intent.Like Yates story,Like the MC boxes being found. Hell they could not even get the ammo right.I believe there were 2 rifles found in the TSBD either could have been used to link to a patsy. and when I say Patsy I mean Living or dead .Both rifles have the caliber on the barrel and other information I gather that the police who found it could read?. This why some of the Carcano's imported to America had to be worked on before export licenses could be issued.
Like Yates storyJust so. Miles It just goes to show you don't have to be intel.to see intel. BUMMBUBUBUUMM.  .Now Walkers going to be thinking "whats that got to do with microprocessors"?. Ian
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 12, 2010, 06:53:26 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 5244
|
Miles After careful consideration regarding the info at the top of the post you so kindly illuminated for me I have pored over this and other info on Pierre Finck. I came up with this:-  I think I am getting the hang of it now?. Do you think Ed Roth was an early C/T?. Ian
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 12, 2010, 07:58:12 PM by Ian Kingsbury »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
leefarley |
September 14, 2010, 10:22:06 PM
|
Group: Guest
|
Is Brian Walker asking silly-assed questions on this thread because he has no idea where to begin in answering the questions I left for him on his own thread re: the Walker bullet? He has no clue. An who calls others idiots. A who calls others morons. A nut who calls others nuts. A complete basket case. Let us know when you have some answers to the questions I asked, Brian? I'm sure one day you'll give us a valid reason why J. Walton Moore left a psycho on the streets after he was informed he had shot at Walker? I have been through this with Lee before. Lee where is your proof that Walker said that Oswald didn't shot at him. You claimed that, I have asked 3 or 4 times now. Nothing. I guess i will get that answer about the same time Miles gives me a list of Doctors who said that JFK had an extrance wound in the right temple. Still waiting. Christ almighty! Does your stupidity know no bounds? It's like conversing with an empty plastic bag. Yes, you've now asked me three times but because you have the reading comprehension of a elderly chimpanzee you've missed the first two times I've answered it for you. Do I really have to lower my own level of intelligence down to yours before you understand or are you simply clinging to this question to hide the fact that you have no clue what I was asking you on your own idiotic thread? I'll tell you what I'll do Brian, I'll answer your question like a five year old. Walker didn't say that Oswald didn't shoot at him. I did write that he "told" us but was simply suggesting that this is what his testimony "said.". In other words, he told us without telling us. I apologise for using language conventions that went way over your head. There, you've asked three times, I've answered it three times. Would you now like to answer my questions just once? We wouldn't want you to prove what everyone already thinks on this forum. That you are not only clueless but also worthless. Christ. Show us the testimony where Walker was suggesting that Oswald couldn't have shot at him. 3 days now. For gods sake show us that part of the testimony that says what you claim. The clowning around continues, eh Brian? The man who knows nothing once again asks others to do his homework for him because he can't comprehend or understand the evidence in the Walker shooting. You are such a waste of space that I don’t know why I’m even bothering but this will answer your question, whether it is to your satisfaction or not is another matter, and you being the thick dunderhead that you are it will more than likely go over your pea sized brain. Turn to page two of Walker's testimony in Volume XI of the Warren Commission hearings and testimony. Yep, page two. You’ve obviously struggled to even read the testimony beyond two pages: General Walker. … As I crossed a window coming downstairs in front, I saw a car at the bottom of the church alley just making a turn onto Turtle Creek. The car was unidentifiable. I could see the two back lights, and you have to look through the trees there, and I could see it moving out. This car would have been about at the right time for anybody that was making a getaway.So what are you going to do Brain-of-the-century? Admit that Oswald could drive and had access to a car? Or admit to a conspiracy in the attempted assassination of General Edwin Walker? As far as any reasonable person is concerned you are on dodgy ground if you want to claim that Oswald was a lone-nut in this attempted assassination: Mr. LIEBELER. Now, I understand that Mr. Surrey saw two men in the vicinity of your house shortly before April 10, 1963, acting in a manner that he regarded as suspicious. Did he report that to you at or about that time?General WALKER. He has reported that to me, and I don’t remember the date on which he did.The HSCA in its findings printed this: Police located a 14-year-old boy in Walker’s neighborhood who said that after hearing the shot, he climbed a fence and looked into an alley to the rear of Walker’s home. The boy said he then saw some men speeding down the alley in a light green or light blue Ford, either a 1959 or 1960 model. He said he also saw another car, a 1958 Chevrolet, black with white down the side, in a church parking lot adjacent to Walker’s house. The car door was open, and a man was bending over the back seat, as though he was placing something on the floor of the car. So what are you going to do Brain? Admit conspiracy? Or bury your head in the sand and believe in the unbelievable? Most people who understand the evidence (that doesn’t include you) actually know that there is something suspiciously absent from General Walker’s testimony. They never asked him about CE 573. He was questioned for two hours and not once did Wesley Liebeler ask him about the bullet that he held in his hands and had “slivers of the jacket shell” on his desk. Not one question. It doesn’t raise any alarm bells for you because you are an indoctrinated but for the rest of us we know why he wasn’t asked about CE573. From Breach of Trust by Gerald McKnight p. 49: The Commission relied heavily on Frazier’s testimony to tie Oswald’s rifle to the Kennedy assassination. Just before he concluded his March 31st Commission testimony Frazier was asked about the Walker bullet (FBI designated Q-188). Commission assistant counsel Melvin A Eisenberg asked whether Q-188 could have been fired from Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano. According to Frazier, the Walker slug was a 6.5mm copper jacketed bullet, but because of its distorted condition he could not answer conclusively. In other words he either guessed [wrongly] or he lied because [returning to McKnight p.49-50]: What Eisenberg carefully avoided and Frazier did not volunteer were the results of the FBI’s spectrographic analysis of Q-188. A week before Frazier appeared before the Commission, Eisenberg met with him and Agent Henry H. Heilberger to review the FBI lab results. …Heilberger concluded in his report (PC78378) that the lead alloy in the Walker bullet was different from the lead alloy of the two large bullet fragments recovered from under the left jump seat presidential limousine.So what did the FBI do, Brian? Well, it’s a no-brainer, they suppressed the record of Heliberger’s results. So what did the Warren Commission do, Brian? Well, another no-brainer, they didn’t call Heilberger as a witness. Clap, clap, clap… As a final gesture I will ask you to look at what happened when Robert Blakey introduced CE573 into evidence at the HSCA. Walker wrote to Blakey and point blank told him that the bullet that the HSCA was entering was NOT the bullet he examined at his home in Turtle Creek. Walker mounted a campaign to have the bullet “withdrawn” and he described it as a “substitute.” His plea fell on deaf ears and CE573 is the “substitute” that is now in the National Archives. Would you care to answer my questions now Brian? I’m not holding my breath because I know you are so clueless you don’t know what half of them were about but I do know what type of reply I’m going to get from what I’ve written above. A clueless one… Hey Brian! What is the translation of what I wrote in answer to your question? some of us on the forum can answer questions that are thrown at us. Unlike you. Oh and don't forget Frankie's reply. Did you not like what we said? Is that why you ignored it?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
frankie vegas |
September 15, 2010, 05:55:52 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
Is Brian Walker asking silly-assed questions on this thread because he has no idea where to begin in answering the questions I left for him on his own thread re: the Walker bullet? He has no clue. An who calls others idiots. A who calls others morons. A nut who calls others nuts. A complete basket case. Let us know when you have some answers to the questions I asked, Brian? I'm sure one day you'll give us a valid reason why J. Walton Moore left a psycho on the streets after he was informed he had shot at Walker? I have been through this with Lee before. Lee where is your proof that Walker said that Oswald didn't shot at him. You claimed that, I have asked 3 or 4 times now. Nothing. I guess i will get that answer about the same time Miles gives me a list of Doctors who said that JFK had an extrance wound in the right temple. Still waiting. Christ almighty! Does your stupidity know no bounds? It's like conversing with an empty plastic bag. Yes, you've now asked me three times but because you have the reading comprehension of a elderly chimpanzee you've missed the first two times I've answered it for you. Do I really have to lower my own level of intelligence down to yours before you understand or are you simply clinging to this question to hide the fact that you have no clue what I was asking you on your own idiotic thread? I'll tell you what I'll do Brian, I'll answer your question like a five year old. Walker didn't say that Oswald didn't shoot at him. I did write that he "told" us but was simply suggesting that this is what his testimony "said.". In other words, he told us without telling us. I apologise for using language conventions that went way over your head. There, you've asked three times, I've answered it three times. Would you now like to answer my questions just once? We wouldn't want you to prove what everyone already thinks on this forum. That you are not only clueless but also worthless. Christ. Show us the testimony where Walker was suggesting that Oswald couldn't have shot at him. 3 days now. For gods sake show us that part of the testimony that says what you claim. The clowning around continues, eh Brian? The man who knows nothing once again asks others to do his homework for him because he can't comprehend or understand the evidence in the Walker shooting. You are such a waste of space that I don’t know why I’m even bothering but this will answer your question, whether it is to your satisfaction or not is another matter, and you being the thick dunderhead that you are it will more than likely go over your pea sized brain. Turn to page two of Walker's testimony in Volume XI of the Warren Commission hearings and testimony. Yep, page two. You’ve obviously struggled to even read the testimony beyond two pages: General Walker. … As I crossed a window coming downstairs in front, I saw a car at the bottom of the church alley just making a turn onto Turtle Creek. The car was unidentifiable. I could see the two back lights, and you have to look through the trees there, and I could see it moving out. This car would have been about at the right time for anybody that was making a getaway.So what are you going to do Brain-of-the-century? Admit that Oswald could drive and had access to a car? Or admit to a conspiracy in the attempted assassination of General Edwin Walker? As far as any reasonable person is concerned you are on dodgy ground if you want to claim that Oswald was a lone-nut in this attempted assassination: Mr. LIEBELER. Now, I understand that Mr. Surrey saw two men in the vicinity of your house shortly before April 10, 1963, acting in a manner that he regarded as suspicious. Did he report that to you at or about that time?General WALKER. He has reported that to me, and I don’t remember the date on which he did.The HSCA in its findings printed this: Police located a 14-year-old boy in Walker’s neighborhood who said that after hearing the shot, he climbed a fence and looked into an alley to the rear of Walker’s home. The boy said he then saw some men speeding down the alley in a light green or light blue Ford, either a 1959 or 1960 model. He said he also saw another car, a 1958 Chevrolet, black with white down the side, in a church parking lot adjacent to Walker’s house. The car door was open, and a man was bending over the back seat, as though he was placing something on the floor of the car. So what are you going to do Brain? Admit conspiracy? Or bury your head in the sand and believe in the unbelievable? Most people who understand the evidence (that doesn’t include you) actually know that there is something suspiciously absent from General Walker’s testimony. They never asked him about CE 573. He was questioned for two hours and not once did Wesley Liebeler ask him about the bullet that he held in his hands and had “slivers of the jacket shell” on his desk. Not one question. It doesn’t raise any alarm bells for you because you are an indoctrinated but for the rest of us we know why he wasn’t asked about CE573. From Breach of Trust by Gerald McKnight p. 49: The Commission relied heavily on Frazier’s testimony to tie Oswald’s rifle to the Kennedy assassination. Just before he concluded his March 31st Commission testimony Frazier was asked about the Walker bullet (FBI designated Q-188). Commission assistant counsel Melvin A Eisenberg asked whether Q-188 could have been fired from Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano. According to Frazier, the Walker slug was a 6.5mm copper jacketed bullet, but because of its distorted condition he could not answer conclusively. In other words he either guessed [wrongly] or he lied because [returning to McKnight p.49-50]: What Eisenberg carefully avoided and Frazier did not volunteer were the results of the FBI’s spectrographic analysis of Q-188. A week before Frazier appeared before the Commission, Eisenberg met with him and Agent Henry H. Heilberger to review the FBI lab results. …Heilberger concluded in his report (PC78378) that the lead alloy in the Walker bullet was different from the lead alloy of the two large bullet fragments recovered from under the left jump seat presidential limousine.So what did the FBI do, Brian? Well, it’s a no-brainer, they suppressed the record of Heliberger’s results. So what did the Warren Commission do, Brian? Well, another no-brainer, they didn’t call Heilberger as a witness. Clap, clap, clap… As a final gesture I will ask you to look at what happened when Robert Blakey introduced CE573 into evidence at the HSCA. Walker wrote to Blakey and point blank told him that the bullet that the HSCA was entering was NOT the bullet he examined at his home in Turtle Creek. Walker mounted a campaign to have the bullet “withdrawn” and he described it as a “substitute.” His plea fell on deaf ears and CE573 is the “substitute” that is now in the National Archives. Would you care to answer my questions now Brian? I’m not holding my breath because I know you are so clueless you don’t know what half of them were about but I do know what type of reply I’m going to get from what I’ve written above. A clueless one… Hey Brian! What is the translation of what I wrote in answer to your question? some of us on the forum can answer questions that are thrown at us. Unlike you. Oh and don't forget Frankie's reply. Did you not like what we said? Is that why you ignored it? Yea! I want to know what you have that the rest of us don't.................
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2010, 05:58:48 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 555
|
Brian Walker is Clueless, its clear he has never really studied the assassination in depth
Dean i have seen you write so many stupid things on here that you can't redeem your self. So for you to think differently then me, means I am doing ok. Post links to the threads of the "so many" stupid things that I have said on this forum Come on Brian its your chance to make me look foolish
-------------------------
-------------------------
"Pictures don't lie-unless they are made to" Harold Weisberg 1966
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
|
