|
|
 September 01, 2010, 12:32:07 AM
|
Full Member
Posts: 109
|
Altgens is almost in the street, here (see below), I've draw lines to him being on (by) the curb. Z's axis is as far, as I can draw (here), towards the left-of-centre of the freeway sign, towards the tower's north-west corner. I'm being as extreme, within parameters of logical reason; to try to address the problem. And in doing so, I still have a massive problem; why have 45 frames separated what is obvious, HERE, from what is SEEN in the Z-frames'? The Z-frames have been seriously altered, FROM THE FREEWAY SIGN ONWARDS, from what I'm demonstrating HERE. Altgens-6 was wired across the world within a few hours, and then mass published. And so, is very unlikely, to have been doctored. You should all be able to determine, from my drawing, that the limo (including configured contents) isn't where it should be according to the Z-frames. Or, that Clapping-man isn't where he should be. Apron-man and Clapping-man, are shown by the Z-frames, to be approximately where the tips of the two blue lines in my drawing from Z end, that is, intersecting within the curb area, to Altgens-6's far right of frame. I'VE USED THE LANE LINE AS REFERENCE POINTS. What's truly remarkable about Altgens-6, is the fact, that one of the World's best combat-photographers, was where he was, at that time, and had his axis, focus, aperture, exposure, and camera, lens, and film selection the way he did, and then squeezed his SLR's shutter release when he did. QUITE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT PHOTOGRAPH EVER TAKEN ON THIS PLANET. 
-------------------------
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 01:09:47 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3791
Well, somebody did it.
|
That picture is about Z256 ,
-------------------------
-------------------------
LN; So how did it happen then ?
CT; I don't know, I only know that it didn't happen the way the evidence says.
LN; We should not use evidence in this case ?
CT; Correct.
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 01:24:03 AM
|
Full Member
Posts: 109
|
What picture?
There are 3 photos in the above composite.
If you mean Altgens-6 was taken a about Z-254, then you haven't read my post, or digested what I'm saying.
Altgens-6 matches the position of the limo at Z-209, or there abouts.
That's what I'm saying ... read the title of my thread, that might help you.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 01:25:07 AM by David Davies »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 01:28:23 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3791
Well, somebody did it.
|
What picture?
There are 3 photos in the above composite.
If you mean Altgens-6 was taken a about Z-254, then you haven't read my post, or digested what I'm saying.
Altgens-6 matches the position of the limo at Z-209, or there abouts.
That's what I'm saying ... read the title of my thread, that might help you.
The Altgens photo you posted matches 256.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 02:30:26 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 5244
|
What picture?
There are 3 photos in the above composite.
If you mean Altgens-6 was taken a about Z-254, then you haven't read my post, or digested what I'm saying.
Altgens-6 matches the position of the limo at Z-209, or there abouts.
That's what I'm saying ... read the title of my thread, that might help you.
David If you have some time go and look in the photo section for Z film alteration by Chris Davidson and others there is a similar anomaly with the timing also the Rosemary Willis thread throws up some odd numbers when timing from other films I found them invaluable when trying to get a fix on the Zfilm. Ian Edit mispell
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 04:45:35 PM by Ian Kingsbury »
|
-------------------------
Some things we know we know,the rest we have to find out for ourselves
One of the first things we found out was that the Warren Commission never pursued a conspiracy investigation.
Louis Stokes
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 02:46:36 AM
|
Full Member
Posts: 109
|
Thanks Ian,
I've been away from this site for 4 months (to the very day, of my last post), and have been trying to come up with a proof that can be understood by legal people, and the less technically minded.
As far as I can now think ... I've had enough of all this.
I just hope this posting might help others to now understand.
I seriously don't think a more simple proof of alteration can be found. Maybe in 3 years time, some bright-spark will.
I think I'll take a back seat from now on, I don't think there is much more I can add to all this.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 02:54:54 AM by David Davies »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 02:50:38 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3791
Well, somebody did it.
|
Thanks Ian,
I've been away from this site for 3 months (to the very day, of my last post), and have been trying to come up with a proof that can be understood by legal people, and the less technically minded.
As far as I can now think ... I've had enough of all this.
I just hope this posting might help others now understand.
I seriously don't think a more simple proof of alteration can be found. Maybe in 3 years time, some bright-spark will.
I think I'll take a back seat from now on, I don't think there is much more I can add to all this.
Hopefully I'm less technical enough to understand it , here is what I see. Let me know if there are any problems with this picture.  There are no anomalies
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 02:51:05 AM by Mark Henceroth »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 03:01:46 AM
|
Full Member
Posts: 109
|
Your diagram, is a diagram, not a photo.
Look (count) the white lane lines, in all the photographic evidence, and plot your points based on photographic material, taken either that day, or soon affer.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 03:29:20 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3791
Well, somebody did it.
|
Your diagram, is a diagram, not a photo.
Look (count) the white lane lines, in all the photographic evidence, and plot your points based on photographic material, taken either that day, or soon affer.
You drew it on the wrong lane markers, try the next set toward the underpass and it will all make sense, 
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
September 01, 2010, 03:31:45 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 6699
|
What picture?
There are 3 photos in the above composite.
If you mean Altgens-6 was taken a about Z-254, then you haven't read my post, or digested what I'm saying.
Altgens-6 matches the position of the limo at Z-209, or there abouts.
That's what I'm saying ... read the title of my thread, that might help you.
In the Altgens photo you can see JFK's hands up in front of his throat. You don't see that same position in Z-209 or any photos just after.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
