|
These 10 questions (there are more too) were not answered by the WC in 1964 and they have not been answered in the many years that followed. I will avoid the obvious ones where the existing evidence is highly suspect too (i.e. magic bullet, extant Z-film, Walker bullet, etc…)
1) What was LHO’s motive for killing JFK?
This is an important part of the process in any investigation as it can show who was more likely to want that person dead. Motive is usually something like money, jealousy, passion, something to gain professionally or personally, and hatred to name some of the more common reasons.
No one has ever showed why LHO would have been motivated to kill JFK. The common reasons just don’t hold up as he could not have been killing JFK for fame as he NEVER claimed credit for one of the greatest shooting feats in history! Furthermore, if he was a Communist as the WC and others have claimed (and there is NO evidence that shows this to be correct) why would he shoot a president who was open to working with the Soviet Union, Cuba and other Communist countries and thus give the job to a man who would be determined to fight Communism everywhere?
2) What weapon did LHO use IF he was the shooter?
The WC claims they had evidence linking LHO to the TSBD rifle, but upon examination this does NOT hold up as the ordering evidence points to an entirely different type of rifle (36” Carbine). There is NO evidence supporting the receiving and ownership issues as the closest we can get is the BY photos. These bring up many new issues like are they genuine? Is LHO in them?
Even if they are genuine, and that is a HUGE IF, so what? How does posing with a pair of guns equate to shooting the president and a police officer?
As for the actual alleged murder weapon they could not link it to LHO beyond a highly questionable palm print in the least. Hoover said in a memo that they could NOT find any prints (beyond the questionable palm print that was NOT there when the FBI first received the rifle) on the rifle, the shell casings or the clip that matched LHO’s. How is this possible for a man who was NOT wearing gloves?
The rifle also was never determined to have been fired the day of the assassination so this alone makes the point of it being used by LHO more easy to refute.
Finally, none of the ballistic evidence that was linked to the alleged murder weapon could be tied to either victim or Gov. Connally. How is this possible IF LHO shot them and used the weapons they claimed he used?
I don’t even want to get into the JDT aspect in full here, but the ballistic evidence is horrible there too. Ditto the Walker shooting.
3) Why did LHO allegedly shoot at an extreme right-wing General AND a supposed very liberal president?
What kind of person does this beyond a hired killer? We have never been given evidence to show us LHO was a gun for hire, so this out of the equation. Why would he target these polar opposites (supposedly Nixon too if we buy what Marina Oswald was saying) then? We don’t know because beyond accusing LHO of committing the acts the WC never gave us any info on why! Ditto the HSCA.
4) Why did the DPD use a description of the JFK shooter to arrest LHO for the shooting of JDT when that went out supposedly a half-hour BEFORE the incident?
I think the sentence pretty much sums it up for us! The DPD used a description of a shooter (minus the clothes he was wearing) that matched half the men in Dallas (many more so than LHO too!) to arrest him for the shooting of a cop many miles away! How many times has this happened in the annals of police work?
5) If LHO did the shooting as the WC and others have claimed, why is the evidence so poor in showing this?
I think the word “poor” is a compliment to the evidence they gave us as well by the way. Why couldn’t WC, HSCA et. al. show evidence that left no doubt in regards to LHO doing the deeds he was accused of?
6) Why would LHO choose to use a rifle instead of using a pistol when NO one had ever used a rifle before to shoot a president?
LHO could NOT drive so why did he not choose the simplest way to shoot JFK IF that is what he wanted?
For years I have the question of why not shoot JFK at Love Field with a pistol? I mean this is much easier than the alleged shooting feat he had to do in DP, isn’t it? JFK came right up to the fence and shook hands and the SS could not stop someone from shooting him if that is what they wanted to do.
Why was JFK obsessed with a “high powered rifle from a high building” scenario too as he commented to several people about this in the weeks leading up to his murder? Could it be he was hearing these same “rumors” too? How did he hear about these “rumors” if it was just LHO dong the shooting? Furthermore, how did the attempts in Chicago and Tampa (and some say Miami too as his motorcade was cancelled at the last minute) come about IF LHO was the ONLY one who wanted JFK dead as we are told?
Also, let’s use Marina’s own testimony to show this is NOT a crazy CT idea, okay?
Mr. RANKIN. Do you know where he practiced with the rifle?
Mrs. OSWALD. I don't know where. I don't know the name of the place where this took place. But I think it was somewhere out of town. It seems to me a place called Lopfield.
Mr. RANKIN. Would that be at the airport---Love Field?
Mrs. OSWALD. Love Field.
Why would LHO be practicing with a rifle at Love Field? Could it be there was a thought of shooting him here instead of DP? What went wrong? It would have been easier since JFK came to the fence and was NOT in a moving vehicle too!
For a solitary man, as the WC claimed, nothing is easier than shooting someone UP CLOSE with a pistol yet the WC never entertained the idea of why would LHO pick such a difficult scenario when he did not have to.
7) Why would LHO choose his workplace as the location for shooting JFK?
Doesn’t this strike anyone as quite odd? I mean generally if you want to try and get away with a crime I would imagine it would help to do it where NO ONE KNOWS WHO YOU ARE! In 1963 they did NOT have the type of equipment they have now to quickly ID you and track you via GPS and other methods, so if you are unknown this greatly increases your chances of getting away with it! As for the claim of “Well he wanted to be famous” we have to go by his behavior after he was arrested! Did it strike anyone as wanting to be famous?
Also, the excuse DVP gave me years ago for not committing the crime at Love Field was that he couldn’t get his rifle there without being seen! First of all, he didn’t need “his” rifle (something I don’t think ever existed by the way) as he could have used a pistol instead and that could have easily been hidden from a cab driver (much better than a bus scenario as again it creates less people who can remember you). Secondly, don’t you think the SAME logic applies to getting a ride from Wes Frazier and then lugging the rifle two to three blocks to the TSBD and then lugging it around until you hide it in the TSBD for later use? These were people who KNEW you too by sight and in some cases by NAME!
Also, it would seem DP was a much tougher place to get away from. At the airport he could have dropped the gun and disappeared into the crowd and then even got on a flight out of town. This sounds much more plausible than the OFFICIAL scenario to me.
When one adds in the fact LHO was NOT very good with a rifle this would seem to make this the ONLY scenario to me.
8) Why did the folks who told LHO to go to Mexico City supposedly NOT let him visit the Cuban Consulate and the Russian Embassy?
I am firmly in the camp of LHO did not go, but if solid evidence (i.e. evidence not like what we currently have) were to emerge that showed he went I would change my mind. Like the BY photos having LHO in Mexico City does NOT mean he shot anyone, instead, it ENFORCES the notion of a conspiracy! This is why I am always disappointed in the fact NO one can show us he went for sure when THE OFFICIAL SIDE KEPT SAYING HE WAS THERE!
IF they had said he did NOT go I would expect the evidence to be suspect, but THEY WANTED LHO THERE AND IT IS STILL HIGHLY SUSPECT! In addition, it is not primary evidence in the sense it does NOT show he went by ITSELF! A visa, a letter, a FM-8, a hotel registry, a notation in LHO’s supposed notebook and some people on a bus do not show he went for sure and when these are looked at individually they crumble like the rest of the evidence in this case.
So I ask again, IF the CIA, the WC and the HSCA wanted LHO in Mexico City when they claimed – why is there NO solid evidence showing he went? In addition, why would the people that made LHO go there NO send him to the embassies when they were under 24 hour surveillance and they would have had proof he went?
NONE of this makes any sense to me, so based on this above data, I have to say he did NOT go. Can anyone provide things that show he did go or at least answer the question?
9) What was the purpose of all the sightings of LHO in the weeks prior to assassination?
These obviously show a conspiracy, but of what kind? I realize they have been tied to framing LHO to the JFK murder, but could they have been for something else? IF you believe the research of Waldron and Hartman they could have been for the overthrow of Cuba and the killing of Castro. This is not a theory that can just be swept away as they do present some interesting evidence for this case and four years later one would see the same pattern used on James Earl Ray (approached by FBI who were working with Cubans to overthrow Castro).
First of all, in all cases it has been documented over the years the REAL LHO was at work or somewhere else so we know these were NOT him! What would be the benefit to LHO if they were him? I mean if you are planning on shooting the president would you go around pretty much announcing it? Or at least drawing a ton of attention to yourself? How did he get to all of these places too? That is the argument used in the Walker incident whereby he BURIED his rifle because he couldn’t be seen with it on a bus. Well how did he get to the shooting range with it? How did he get to “Love Field” with it if you believe Marina’s testimony? Who was driving him if you don’t believe he used a bus? Doesn’t that mean a conspiracy?
It would seem to me a man like LHO, a supposed loner, would not go around shooting his mouth off in the weeks before the biggest thing he will ever do! IF he wanted to be famous as the WC said, why would he risk all that by doing these things?
As usual, the WC and other official bodies contradict themselves yet again!
10) Why did LHO go to a movie theater after allegedly shooting the president and a police officer?
Does this make any sense IF we believe what the WC told us? Is this the normal reaction for most people? I mean the Mexican border was not that far away and research has shown NONE of the bus, rail or air terminals were alerted or blocked off so LHO could have hopped on any of these things and gotten clean away!
Yet he instead goes to a movie theater! Why? We have NO clue as the WC only told us he was walking down the street (another dumb thing to do) when a cop car scared him into the movie theater. The thing that got him noticed supposedly was the act of NOT paying when he had the money on him! This is up there with him littering his shell casings at the TSBD and the JDT scenes (at this location it has been said he left his wallet with ID in it for good measure!)! Yet none of this “catch me” behavior was shown when he was arrested as he said he was innocent and did NOT confess to anything they claimed he did!
If you don’t believe in a conspiracy how can you explain this very odd behavior? YOU can’t so you call others who point it out all kinds of names!
Perhaps at some point in the future I will do more questions with NO answers, but others are welcomed to add any they want.
-------------------------
-------------------------
A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. -- John F. Kennedy
"Benavides- Saw Oswald kill Tippit, picked him out of a lineup." - Brian "Doesn't Know His Rear From His Back" Walker
|
