|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 August 06, 2010, 06:28:05 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3606
|
YATES' Report:
How could Yates have known about the curtain rods in a 4 1/2 foot long package?
Yates says he picked up "Oswald" at 10:30 AM on what he later realized was the 20th of Nov.
Dempsey Jones said that Yates told him about this passenger before the 22nd.
Was Yates' passenger Oswald or an impostor?  Typical conspiracy nut. He doesn't believe the 6 or so witnesses who said that Oswald killed Tippit, but he believes this story as a fact, because one guy said it. This is how they come to the conspiracy conclusion. The story doesn't even make any sense like usual for a Miles thread. Maybe I am missing something. Let me know if I am. But here goes wit a little common sense. If this guy was correct and it was Oswald, why would Oswald go around talking about the assasination. Makes no sense. If it was someone trying to frame Oswald, why would he go around acting like Oswald asking about the assasination when Oswald was at work. Wasn't the point to frame Oswald without anyone knowing he was framed. Just a little common sense thing. But Miles won't let that get in his way, in the search for the truth.
-------------------------
-------------------------
What is silly is thinking that two turns that reduced the speed of the car to 8-11 m.p.h. is no big deal when motorcades are suppose to keep a 44 m.p.h. speed..R Caprio
LHO had poor hand-eye coordination and proof of this is seen in the fact he couldn't drive an automobile-- R Caprio
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 06, 2010, 06:49:39 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2353
Germany
|
Absolutely odd this story. It contains 3 main aspects and circumstantial evidences upon which Oswald was accused of murdering the president: 1. " Curtain rods" in a " brown paper bag" 2. The (possible) Backyard photo(s) and ... 3. that he was talking of killing the president.... FOUR actually: he asked for the Carousel Club.... no wait FIFE: Ruby. Five aspects... no wait SIX: the murder scene Houston / Elm StThis is so bizarre. Yates either must have gathered all these detailed information about Oswalds background when he was watching the news reports and was reading the papers that weekend in order to invent this venturous story, but WHY ? To shove his weigh around and to be somebody at a time when everybody was rather a little afraid of saying anything as a witness ? Or this is true 
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 06, 2010, 06:52:57 PM by Gerry_Dark »
|
-------------------------
"ich bin ein Berliner" As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login"There's none so blind as those who will not see."
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 06, 2010, 06:51:35 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2353
Germany
|
YATES' Report:
How could Yates have known about the curtain rods in a 4 1/2 foot long package?
Yates says he picked up "Oswald" at 10:30 AM on what he later realized was the 20th of Nov.
Dempsey Jones said that Yates told him about this passenger before the 22nd.
Was Yates' passenger Oswald or an impostor? Typical conspiracy nut. He doesn't believe the 6 or so witnesses who said that Oswald killed Tippit, but he believes this story as a fact, because one guy said it. This is how they come to the conspiracy conclusion. The story doesn't even make any sense like usual for a Miles thread. Maybe I am missing something. Let me know if I am. But here goes wit a little common sense. If this guy was correct and it was Oswald, why would Oswald go around talking about the assasination. Makes no sense. If it was someone trying to frame Oswald, why would he go around acting like Oswald asking about the assasination when Oswald was at work. Wasn't the point to frame Oswald without anyone knowing he was framed. Just a little common sense thing. But Miles won't let that get in his way, in the search for the truth.good point, the last sentence of yours. It doesn't really make sense does it ?!
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 06, 2010, 06:52:34 PM by Gerry_Dark »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 06, 2010, 06:55:38 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 8744
|
YATES' Report:
How could Yates have known about the curtain rods in a 4 1/2 foot long package?
Yates says he picked up "Oswald" at 10:30 AM on what he later realized was the 20th of Nov.
Dempsey Jones said that Yates told him about this passenger before the 22nd.
Was Yates' passenger Oswald or an impostor? Typical conspiracy nut. He doesn't believe the 6 or so witnesses who said that Oswald killed Tippit, but he believes this story as a fact, because one guy said it. This is how they come to the conspiracy conclusion. The story doesn't even make any sense like usual for a Miles thread. Maybe I am missing something. Let me know if I am. But here goes wit a little common sense. If this guy was correct and it was Oswald, why would Oswald go around talking about the assasination. Makes no sense. If it was someone trying to frame Oswald, why would he go around acting like Oswald asking about the assasination when Oswald was at work. Wasn't the point to frame Oswald without anyone knowing he was framed. Just a little common sense thing. But Miles won't let that get in his way, in the search for the truth. Typical conspiracy nut. Typical LN fool. He doesn't believe the 6 or so witnesses who said that Oswald killed Tippit That's a false statement. And a stupid one as well. I never said this. Show a quote., but he believes this story as a fact, because one guy said it. False, again. This shows you do not know what you talking about. TWO witnesses reported this. This is how they come to the conspiracy conclusion. This is how you make an ass out of yourself: by not knowing the basic facts before you spew misstatement of fact.The story doesn't even make any sense like usual for a Miles thread. Yes, my post makes perfectly good sense. Maybe I am missing something. You show that you are missing the facts. Let me know if I am. No, you figure it out. Duh. But here goes wit a little common sense. You mean here goes BS.If this guy was correct and it was Oswald, why would Oswald go around talking about the assasination. Makes no sense. Makes perfectly good sense, if Oswald's assignment was to set the stage of his being a patsy.If it was someone trying to frame Oswald, why would he go around acting like Oswald asking about the assasination when Oswald was at work. Simple. After the assassination it would take time to sort through the conflicting reports. This would give time for the conspirators to cover their operators & themselves. Wasn't the point to frame Oswald without anyone knowing he was framed. NO. Wrong & stupid assumption. Just a little common sense thing. No. Just a piece of dumb junk thinking and/or dumb junk propaganda. But Miles won't let that get in his way, in the search for the truth. That's TRUE! You have finally said something true.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
