 Duncan MacRae |
 November 05, 2008, 04:15:56 PM
|
Group: Guest
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 06, 2008, 01:33:18 PM
|
Newbie
Posts: 21
|
Very interesting, but I disagree with Robert Harris on two points.
1) The second headshot from the knoll did not occur half a second later but a split second later, almost simultaneously. within one Zapruder frame, thus within 1/18 second. The shot from the rear was not an explosive bullet, the shot from the front was. The forward headsnap is caused by the bullet from behind, which strikes first. This forward headsnap is not visible to the naked eye at normal speed. It can only be detected by comparing frame 312 and 313. The head snaps forward about 2-3 inches. This is caused by the bullet from the behind. What we see being blown out of the right temple at frame 313 is debris from the IMPACT from the grassy knoll bullet, which strikes a fraction later than the back bullet. Many people don't know this, but that is how debris behaves when a bullet strikes something. It leaves a cone of debris in the opposite direction of the bullet, much like a stone hitting the water. This same bullet then explodes inside the skull after penetrating the temple bone, causing the major blowout in the back of the head, as well as the temple flap of skull where it entered.
2) The autopsy photo of the back of the head IS a forgery. There is no way that the damage done to the back of the head , described by all the doctors and actually visible in the Zapruder film could look like that just by folding back a bone flap with skin and hair on it. Besides, there was still much bone missing (think of the large Harper fragment for example). This photo does not show any holes in the head. It looks like Kennedy has received no wound there whatsoever. In addition, an honest autopsy would show the wounds as they actually were and appeared to the eye, NOT to cover-up (literally) how they looked like. Examining and photographing the wounds as they are, is what an autopsy is all about. The wounds in this photo are no way near to what they actually looked like.
Wim
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John B Beckham |
February 08, 2009, 08:36:10 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
hey Bob! i enjoyed your Lee Harvey Oswald vids! THANKS!!!
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin |
March 19, 2009, 01:24:52 PM
|
Group: Guest
|
The second headshot from the knoll did not occur half a second later but a split second later, almost simultaneously. Wim That is incorrect Wim, the shots fired from the Grassy Knoll were simultaneous,  This detail from the Moorman Polaroid has "down hole" shots of both weapons firing, for the fact that witnesses including Mary Moorman and her companion testified that there were two distinct shots, is because some meters separated the shooters and the sound had to travel that much further!!  The red spot shows the location of the weapon behind the picket fence some ten meters past the corner, identified as a "Short Sam" version of an AR 15 rifle, in the super enhanced pic a la the Badgeman pic below, that has disappeared from the internet!! The "pinwheel" pattern is where the flash dissipated thru the flash hider at the muzzle!!   This is the original pic taken that day, enhancement of the corner of the rotunda wall...  Carried out by a supercomputer, which individually scrutinized each pixel in the Moorman print...  Shows Dallas policeman Joseph Smith firing from behind the rotunda wall, While Charles Frederick Rogers fires from behind the picket fence  !! http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,496.0.html
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 19, 2009, 02:26:08 PM by Martin Timothy »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin |
March 19, 2009, 09:03:26 PM
|
Group: Guest
|
For the fact that the firer has a lower profile than Arnold, is because he was firing from a semi crouched stance!!
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 19, 2009, 11:24:04 PM
|
Hero Member
Posts: 3714
|
For the fact that the firer has a lower profile than Arnold, is because he was firing from a semi crouched stance!!
Martin, That's pure nonsense!! The fence was about 5 and a half feet high (maybe taller). No "crouching" was possible. Try again. OOOhhhh, here's a thought, Badge Man and Gordon Arnold are BOTH FICTION, neither were there!! Not to mention, again, how did the bullet fired by the Badge Man go out over the retaining wall and then head downward toward the limo? I've been there, I've looked at that shot, and it's impossible, no line of sight for the fatal head shot for Badge Man.
-------------------------
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin |
March 20, 2009, 12:15:02 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
For the fact that the firer has a lower profile than Arnold, is because he was firing from a semi crouched stance!!
That's pure nonsense!! The fence was about 5 and a half feet high (maybe taller). No "crouching" was possible.  This shot clearly shows that the ground inside the rotunda wall adjacent to the corner, is considerably higher than the outside which well might be over five feet, then check the vid below from 1 minute 28 seconds, where Gordon Arnold is standing where he was on the day, and note that as much of his body is exposed as is shown in the enhanced view of the Moorman Polaroid!! <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hn1-dy5-Ebs&ap=%2526fmt%3D18&rel=0&fs=1" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/Hn1-dy5-Ebs&ap=%2526fmt%3D18&rel=0&fs=1</a>]]> Notwithstanding the narrators BS, and for the fact that he quotes Jack White who is a falsifier...  Jack White’s 911 Studies. See his 911 montage, which gives the incorrect time of the emanation of a pyroclastic cloud from the vicinity of WTC's 4, 5 & 6, he says was at 9:04 am just after the South Tower air strike, when it was in fact at 10:00 am, as the South Tower began to disintegrate!!
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 20, 2009, 01:13:22 AM by Martin Timothy »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin |
March 20, 2009, 12:47:16 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
Martin I appreciate the response, however I am gonna stand by my assertion that the ground inside the wall is higher than at the outside, that the policeman was in a crouched posture as he fired, and that the Badgeman pic and the Moorman Polaroid, are both true records of the affairs of the day... MT.
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 20, 2009, 01:08:10 AM
|
Hero Member
Posts: 2186
|
Martin I appreciate the response, however I am gonna stand by my assertion that the ground inside the wall is higher than at the outside, that the policeman was in a crouched posture as he fired, and that the Badgeman pic and the Moorman Polaroid, are both true records of the affairs of the day... MT.
Well, thats up to you to think what you may see and what your interpretation of all that is. Don't expect to convince somebody here because your observations at most, are far away from logic. Thats my opinion. ;) Martin
-------------------------
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 20, 2009, 05:30:36 AM
|
Hero Member
Posts: 3714
|
Martin Timothy,
Your photo proves nothing. I will say again, if one is standing right up next to the fence then you would only be able to see their head and shoulders. Unless they were about 7 feet tall, in which case you'd be able to see a little more of their upper body. But still, even a 7 foot tall assassin would not be able to "crouch" behind the fence and still see what was going on on the other side. I assure you that no way was there a policeman "crouching" behind that fence and be able to look out over the fence. I'm really not sure why you posted that last photo, it has no relevance whatsoever, as you cannot see the ground at the point where it meets the fence. In case you don't know, Badge Man was supposedly behind the fence, so unless you show me a photo of the area behind the fence where the ground meets the fence and the fence is short enough for one to "crouch" behind and still be able to pull off a shot, then you have no grounds for your ridiculous claim.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 20, 2009, 05:32:30 AM by Bill Brown »
|
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
StudiesSearchLinksNotepadLoginRegister