|
|
 June 17, 2010, 08:37:46 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2203
|
It does not sound that spectacular loud, doesn't it?
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 17, 2010, 09:25:17 PM by Duncan MacRae »
|
-------------------------
chase the truth and the devil will overtake you
politics is a conspiracy by nature
listen to jazz
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2010, 08:45:15 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
It does not sound that spectacular loud, doesn't it?
Chris, Are you still buying into that Files junk? Really?
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 17, 2010, 09:26:09 PM by Duncan MacRae »
|
-------------------------
Marsh can not even comprehend a simple time stamp. How will he ever comprehend the evidence?
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2010, 09:14:52 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
Mike,
I see a large gaping hole on the back of JFK's skull at the occipital area and a back-and-to-the-left movement in the Zapruder film. Something must be the reason for it. And James Files tells his story very auntentically, answers questions promptly and there are a lot of intelligent and wise conclusions uttered in the threads on jfkmurdersolved.com/forum. Sorry if I disappoint you. I also believe Malcolm Summers and see the man in the Bothun photo and I think, Holland and the others didn't invent the gunsmoke smell and the footprints behind the fence. And there is Lansdale, the 3 "tramps" and INTERPEN members on Dealey Plaza ... The LNT is just too simple, sorry.
Chris
LoL Thats because there was nothing complex about the shooting. Pretty straight forward.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2010, 11:05:56 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2203
|
LoL Thats because there was nothing complex about the shooting. Pretty straight forward.
Lol. I like straight-forward-people! I myself are pretty conflicted in contrary and I do not like that on myself. Chris
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 18, 2010, 12:31:54 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
LoL Thats because there was nothing complex about the shooting. Pretty straight forward.
Lol. I like straight-forward-people! I myself are pretty conflicted in contrary and I do not like that on myself. Chris What really kills me is all the kooks saying how hard these shots were with a rifle, then they claim someone did it with a pistol! Now theres common sense lol
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 18, 2010, 04:26:16 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2338
|
Chris
You seriously don't want to make a judgement call of the noise from the .221 Remington Fireball based on a recording of it, do you? Or based on what sort of audio playback system you listened to it on? Do you have any idea at all of how much less loud gunshots in videos are, compared to being there beside the gun in real life?
-------------------------
-------------------------
"you're the cop, you figure it out"
-Lee H. Oswald to Dallas Police detectives, weekend
of 11-22-63.
"Part of the reason why we avoided talking about this thing, because every time you say something, somebody misinterprets what you say."
-James. J. Humes, excerpt of ARRB statement, 2-13-96
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2353
Germany
|
Chris
You seriously don't want to make a judgement call of the noise from the .221 Remington Fireball based on a recording of it, do you? Or based on what sort of audio playback system you listened to it on? Do you have any idea at all of how much less loud gunshots in videos are, compared to being there beside the gun in real life?
some soundsystems can't even record noises above a certain decible level. And i suppose if Zapruder's camera would have had a mike attached to it and IF someone like Files would have fired a shot with a Fireball (without silencer) the shot would probably not be audible in the film. Does anybody know the decibel level that Zapruder would have been exposed to If Files had fired a Fireball ? PS: from 8:10 into the video things getting fairly interesting: - very little recoil (no mule kicking) - expert says it is absolutely no problem to shoot accuratly - the shell isn't hot at all, and look at the dent, the teeth mark, exactly as the marks on the "Files" shell. ... hmm, i really like the Files story, it is very exiting !
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 19, 2010, 05:39:04 PM by Gerry_Dark »
|
-------------------------
"ich bin ein Berliner" As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login"There's none so blind as those who will not see."
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 23, 2010, 07:48:45 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9042
|
Chris
You seriously don't want to make a judgement call of the noise from the .221 Remington Fireball based on a recording of it, do you? Or based on what sort of audio playback system you listened to it on? Do you have any idea at all of how much less loud gunshots in videos are, compared to being there beside the gun in real life?
some soundsystems can't even record noises above a certain decible level. And i suppose if Zapruder's camera would have had a mike attached to it and IF someone like Files would have fired a shot with a Fireball (without silencer) the shot would probably not be audible in the film. Does anybody know the decibel level that Zapruder would have been exposed to If Files had fired a Fireball ? PS: from 8:10 into the video things getting fairly interesting: - very little recoil (no mule kicking) - expert says it is absolutely no problem to shoot accuratly - the shell isn't hot at all, and look at the dent, the teeth mark, exactly as the marks on the "Files" shell. ... hmm, i really like the Files story, it is very exiting ! Gerry, you saw "very little recoil"? I have to disagree 100%. I saw plenty of recoil, enough of it to where James Files could not have seen through the scope what he said that he saw!
-------------------------
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
June 23, 2010, 09:28:54 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
Chris
You seriously don't want to make a judgement call of the noise from the .221 Remington Fireball based on a recording of it, do you? Or based on what sort of audio playback system you listened to it on? Do you have any idea at all of how much less loud gunshots in videos are, compared to being there beside the gun in real life?
some soundsystems can't even record noises above a certain decible level. And i suppose if Zapruder's camera would have had a mike attached to it and IF someone like Files would have fired a shot with a Fireball (without silencer) the shot would probably not be audible in the film. Does anybody know the decibel level that Zapruder would have been exposed to If Files had fired a Fireball ? PS: from 8:10 into the video things getting fairly interesting: - very little recoil (no mule kicking) - expert says it is absolutely no problem to shoot accuratly - the shell isn't hot at all, and look at the dent, the teeth mark, exactly as the marks on the "Files" shell. ... hmm, i really like the Files story, it is very exiting ! Gerry, you saw "very little recoil"? I have to disagree 100%. I saw plenty of recoil, enough of it to where James Files could not have seen through the scope what he said that he saw! DUDE! Given the weight an muzzle velocity it would be a huge recoil!
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2010, 04:40:02 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9042
|
Bill & Mike,
ok, i am a layperson and to me it looks like little recoil, my understanding of a kicks_like_a_mule_recoil would be if the gun would go up °90 or more.
thanks for the info :)
best, Gerda
Gerry, I understand what you're saying. I just think that the recoil was enough of one to where James Files could not have seen the things through the scope that he claimed he saw after the shot was fired. Read the transcripts of his interviews. He claims to have seen things through the scope after firing the shot. He couldn't have seen these things through the scope. If he were really there he would know that he would have been so close that he wouldn't have even needed the scope to see these things that he described seeing.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
