HomeSubscribe Live FeedJFK Research Photo GalleryStoreJFK Youtube ChannelArticlesSearchLinksNotepadLoginRegister
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 07:12:25 AM
News:

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
"Nobody said what?" The Midnight Press Conference  (Read 1809 times)
Super Member
*****

Posts: 1711


I'd like to clear this one up because it's important. There have been many characterizations of Oswald's demeanor at the midnight press conference, particularly his look of "surprise" upon hearing that he was charged with the murder of JFK.

I disagree with this depiction of events. To me, it's very clear that he has almost NO reaction to this news. If you pay close attention to the sequence of events in the video, it goes like this:

REPORTER: Did you kill the President?

OSWALD: No, I have not been charged with that. In fact, nobody has said that to me yet. The first thing I heard about it was when the newspaper reporters in the hall axed me that question.


THEN...

A reporter kneeling direction in front of Oswald says:

REPORTER: You HAVE been charged.

Oswald looks directly at the man who said it. He makes no reaction, other than a slight lean forward and in a very polite tone of voice, he says:

OSWALD: Sir?

As if to say...I'm sorry, I didn't hear what you said.

The reporter then tried to repeat his statement -

REPORTER: You have...

And THEN....some loudmouth reporter SHOUTS from Oswald's left -

LOUDMOUTH: NOBODY SAID WHAT?

That caused Oswald to look up, with a definite irritation on his face. It's obvious that he was hoping to present himself in a coherent, calm manner but the obnoxious shouting prompted Fritz to end the press conference. Oswald is led away, very clearly still interested in speaking to the reporters, witness his leaning over to tell the reporter that "A policeman hit me."

His look is not one of surprise at being charged with JFK's murder, and that's proven even further by his demeanor as he's led away.

He's not shocked or stunned. He's not soiling his shorts. He wants to stay and talk to the reporters some more.

The characterization of him being shocked or surprised makes no sense.

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. <a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=register">Register</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=login">Login</a>


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2308


I received this info from Gary Mack.....

"The reporters, whose request led to the midnight press conference, were under the impression from police that Oswald had already been charged with killing JFK.  But they didn't know the charge was delayed, so KRLD newsman Bill Mercer, whom I've known for years, simply advised Oswald that he had been charged.

Oswald's slight surprise is due to the fact that he hadn't heard about it....and said so.  The formal arraignment, of course, would have been held Sunday or Monday."

I seem to remember, but can't find a source for the following. Henry Wade had intended to charge Oswald with the murder of JFK as part of an "International Communist Conspiracy". However Wade was instructed to remove this before the official arrainment. The reporters were operating under the impression that Oswald had been formally charged but were unaware that Oswald's arrainment had been delayed due to the change in wording.

I can understand now believe that Oswald's reaction can be explained by this circumstance, he had not been charged but is reacting to being told he had been by a reporter.

Edit....update.....

From Henry Wade's WC testimony....

Mr. RANKIN. Mr. Wade, will you give us the substance of what Mr. Carr said to you and what you said to him at that time?
Mr. WADE. All I remember--I don't actually remember or know what night it was I talked to him but I assume it was that night because he did mention that the rumor was out that we were getting ready to file a charge of Oswald being part of an international conspiracy, and I told him that that was not going to be done.
It was late at night and I believe that is----
Mr. DULLES. It must have been Saturday night, wasn't it?
Mr. WADE. No; that was Friday night.
Mr. DULLES. Friday night.
Mr. WADE. And I told him, and then I got a call, since this happened, I talked to Jim Bowie, my first assistant who had talked to, somebody had called him, my phone had been busy and Barefoot Sanders, I talked to him, and he they all told that they were concerned about their having received calls from Washington and somewhere else, and I told them that there wasn't any such crime in Texas, I didn't know where it came from, and that is what prompted me to go down and take the complaint, otherwise I never would have gone down to the police station.
Mr. RANKIN. Did you say anything about whether you had evidence to support such a complaint of a conspiracy?
Mr. WADE. Mr. Rankin, I don't know what evidence we have, we had at that time and actually don't know yet what all the evidence was.
I never did see, I was told they had a lot of Fair Play for Cuba propaganda or correspondence on Oswald, and letters from the Communist Party, and it was probably exaggerated to me.
I was told this. I have never seen any of that personally. Never saw any of it that night. But whether he was a Communist or whether he wasn't, had nothing to do with solving the problem at hand, the filing of the charge.
I also was very, I wasn't sure I was going to take a complaint, and a justice of the peace will take a complaint lots of times because he doesn't have to try it. I knew I would have to try this case and that prompted me to go down and see what kind of evidence they had.



-------------------------
« Last Edit: May 15, 2010, 04:01:55 PM by Colin Crow »

-------------------------
Even the Lone Ranger had a partner!
Beware of geeks bearing gifs!

   ReplyReply
Newbie
*

Posts: 4


Quote
There are other things going on in that room at that exact same time that could just as easily explain Oswald's "reaction". 

But not the obvious 'thing' that he's thrown off balance by the statement that he's been accused of shooting the Prez. And why the " " for Reaction. As if Oswald's "Reaction" were a figment of the conspiratorial imagination.

Quote
Is this supposed to mean something?

Not to you, apparently.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Gallery

JFKForum.com

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines