HomeSubscribe Live FeedJFK Research Photo GalleryStoreJFK Youtube ChannelArticlesSearchLinksNotepadLoginRegister
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 07:03:14 AM
News:

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18]
Z FILM ALTERATION REVEALED-BOMBSHELL DROPPED  (Read 11051 times)
Super Member
*****

Posts: 623


Hello everyone,

I'm going to reveal the key to the Zfilm timing riddle first.

Then I will follow up with supporting proof.

This way, you will start thinking (hopefully in terms of timing) about those idiosyncrasies that have bothered researchers for years, pertaining to the film.

The key to the Z film is the limo timing/position within the film itself.

It is approx. 2 seconds ahead of where it should be in relation to it's frame count.

In other words, at Z133, the limo should be approx 2 seconds closer to the corner of Houston and Elm St. Or in reality Z133 would be Z100 approx.

Part 1

chris













-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2633


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Robin,

If you put Phil Willis in a position to run directly past the corner of the fountain or very close to, according to Drommer, straight line measurement would be approx 226.25 Ft to the bottom step. Shortest distance run.

We can now use the Muchmore frame to place his time in sync, with either Dorman or Hughes.

I'll use Hughes for this exercise. I did change Hughes FPS from 17.15 to 17 in this exercise for a closer match with a Dorman scenario.

In the photo provided, Willis is at Hughes frame 502. Another 101 frames gets him to my sync point at Hughes frame 603. In between this span is 135 (break in film frames).

So difference in span = 236 total Hughes frames.

Hughes 236/17FPS= 13.88 seconds   Then: 226.25 Ft/13.88 seconds =16.30 ft per second.   1mph=1.42 ft per sec.   So 16.30/1.42 = 11.47 mph.

Dorman with the same formula applied would be 11.45 mph.

Myer's "time before headshot" 26.77 to my sync at 13.34 would be 11.95 mph.

The slowest Willis can run and make it to where we see him at the bottom steps is about 11.5 mph.

Of course, this does not take into consideration if Willis actually took his picture at the moment we see him in Muchmore.

Therefore, he has even less time to make it to the steps, so his running speed would be even greater than what I have posted.


chris











Thanks Chris.



Very Nice.







Can you tell me where you got you identity for the man in the Muchmore frame as Willis.  ?


I recall Gary Mack giving me the guys name once, i am sure if he had said it was Willis i would have remembered it  !



Having said that you may well be right, i had in the back of my brain that the man was with the press / newspaper  ?  ( not sure )


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 623


Robin,

I would say more by "process of elimination" and Willis' own testimony, besides where he took his last photo on Houston St. from.

There is only one partly bald headed person in Z133 , that person is Willis. Croft is the only other person that far down, and he has a hat on.

Or, you might choose to believe there were 2 partially bald headed men in suits, both taking photos, pretty close to each other (Muchmore), and 1 of them took off across the plaza, and down toward Elm.

chris









-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 623


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Jerry,

It looks as if his right leg has landed/planted on the concrete walkway (past the last stair step), and his left leg might be leaving the last step.

The next frame(after my sync point) in each sequence, looks as though it's his first full step with the left leg.

chris




Chris, thank you.
As always, very keenly observed.

One thing that makes me think we may not be seeing the same footsteps in Martin and Bell is the right leg.

In Martin, the right foot and lower right leg remain relatively fixed for a little less than 1/2 second (using your 18.59 FPS).
In Bell, the entire man, including his right foot and lower right leg have completely disappeared in a little less than 1/4 second (using your 16.9 FPS).

So how can we be looking at the same step if it takes 1/4 second in Bell and 1/2 second in Martin?
My theory (and it's only a theory - I'm not married to the idea) is that Bell shows us the man descending the steps and Martin shows us the man later, completely on the sidewalk.
As per this diagram.

Also note, if we use appropriately sized, adult figures, then it's impossible for the man to disappear to his left in Martin until he is past the angle on the monument. There isn't room for him to get out of Martin's LOS until he passes that point.
He cannot disappear from Martin in a single step if either foot is on the stairs.
 
Therefore I place him closer to the street and not somewhat on the steps as in Bell.

Best to you,
Jerry



Jerry,

Here's a revise on the Martin sync you corrected for me.

There is no overlapping coverage between the beginning of Martin and Bell. So an unknown variable is created (Distance by mysteryman (Willis) traveled between Bell sync point (frame 28) and Martin first frame).

The end sync point is the gentleman in Z walking out from the stairs. Again, another unknown time/distance.

This is my best guess at this time.

In order to fulfill the above scenario, Martin frame 207 starts at the 13.03 mark.

In other words, I had to move Martin back 7 frames.

When I do this and run 71 Martin frames at 20.17 FPS, it ends at Z139.

This allows the stairman in Z, 7 frames to get to where we see him in Z146.

Split the difference in essence.

Because of the common sync points I used in determining the other FPS's, Martin stays at 20.17, which is very close to what Myer's stated.

I tried some other scenarios, for instance, decreasing Martin's FPS, but in doing so, this gives stairman in Z, less frames traveled to Z146.

I'm open for other suggestions, if any arise.

chris
















-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2139


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Blakey and others were able to fire two shots within 1.66 seconds. Remember that the acoustical evidence showed the first two shots separated by only 30 frames.




So that's shoot....recycle the chamber with the bolt action....and shoot once more? Where is the time built in to reacquire the target and aim?  scratch


-------------------------

-------------------------
But peace does not rest in the charters and covenants alone. It lies in the hearts and minds of all people- John F. Kennedy

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 6699


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

So that's shoot....recycle the chamber with the bolt action....and shoot once more? Where is the time built in to reacquire the target and aim?  scratch

Who said anything about aiming? Blakey was able to do it without aiming. Others have been able to do it with dead aiming or using the iron sights.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 305




If you knew anything relative to the subject matter, then you would also know that Mr. West took his "TRUE" elevations from a USGS marker that is just up the street from where the assassination occurred.

The Time/Life survey work is inaccurate as it did not utilize established elevations.

Vertical (elevation) control was fully established during the SS assassination re-enactment (and survey plat) of December 1963, when a control point elevation was "carried" from the USGS marker into a point on the curb of Elm St.

Thereafter, the exact same elevation control was utilized throughout the FBI assassination re-enactment (and survey plat) of February 7, 1964, and the Warren Commission re-enactment (and survey plat) of May 1964.

The "Drommer" plat utilized an "assumed" elevation.

However, through utilization/comparison of this "assumed" elevation with the true known elevations, an "adjustment" can be derived in which each and every elevation shown on the Drommer survey plat can be easily converted to the true (above sea level) elevation utilized by Mr. West, and as established from the existing USGS survey marker.


Tom

For those who wish to deal in fact!


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 6699


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If you knew anything relative to the subject matter, then you would also know that Mr. West took his "TRUE" elevations from a USGS marker that is just up the street from where the assassination occurred.

The Time/Life survey work is inaccurate as it did not utilize established elevations.

Vertical (elevation) control was fully established during the SS assassination re-enactment (and survey plat) of December 1963, when a control point elevation was "carried" from the USGS marker into a point on the curb of Elm St.

Thereafter, the exact same elevation control was utilized throughout the FBI assassination re-enactment (and survey plat) of February 7, 1964, and the Warren Commission re-enactment (and survey plat) of May 1964.

The "Drommer" plat utilized an "assumed" elevation.

However, through utilization/comparison of this "assumed" elevation with the true known elevations, an "adjustment" can be derived in which each and every elevation shown on the Drommer survey plat can be easily converted to the true (above sea level) elevation utilized by Mr. West, and as established from the existing USGS survey marker.


Tom

For those who wish to deal in fact!

If you knew how to quote properly we could figure out what the Hell you are talking about.
What are you trying to correct? Whom are you trying to correct? What did someone say that you think is wrong?
If you are such an expert, then answer these three questions.
Regarding the distance from the middle of Main Street to the face of the TSBD:
1. What is the distance in feet on the West map (WC exhibits)?
2. What is the distance in feet on the original HSCA map?
3  What is the distance in feet on the revised HSCA map?
4. Who spotted the error on the orginal HSCA and corrected it?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18]


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Gallery

JFKForum.com

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines