|
|
 March 12, 2010, 05:41:30 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2085
|
<![CDATA[As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
<a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=register">Register</a> or <a href="http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=login">Login</a>]]>
-------------------------
-------------------------
An opinion based on something other than fact, is an opinion based on ignorance. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010, 05:49:39 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 7886
|
Jean Hill
Ed Hoffman
Gordon Arnold
Roger Craig
Beverly Oliver
Plenty more.
-------------------------
-------------------------
"The TRUTH doesn't require anyone's belief." - Dale Myers
"The human mind craves a mystery more than it loves the truth." - Dan Rather
"Reason does not always appeal to unreasonable men." - John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2010, 12:08:04 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2221
|
Jean Hill
Ed Hoffman
Gordon Arnold
Roger Craig
Beverly Oliver
Plenty more.
Domingo Benavides Howard Brennan Marrion Baker
-------------------------
-------------------------
Even the Lone Ranger had a partner!
Beware of geeks bearing gifs!
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2010, 10:04:22 AM
|
Newbie
Posts: 47
|
Why Roger Craig Bill?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2010, 08:48:50 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 9143
|
I don think she did change her story.
First she was asked if she saw a person fire the weapon. She said she did not see any person fire the weaopn.
In the second part she was asked if she saw a gunman.
She said she saw a puff of smoke and a flash of light. She never said she saw a person.
Bob, She has certainly changed her story, and on more than one point. All you have to do is review her testimony over the years and you will see what I mean. Mike
-------------------------
-------------------------
Marsh can not even comprehend a simple time stamp. How will he ever comprehend the evidence?
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 24, 2010, 07:06:53 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 7886
|
Why Roger Craig Bill?
Roger Craig was interviewed in 1968 by the Los Angeles Free Press. In that interview he was asked if he handled the rifle. This was his response: "Yes, I did. I couldn't give its name because I don't know foreign rifles, I know it was foreign made, and you loaded it downward into a built-in clip. The ID man took it and ejected one live round from it. The scope was facing north, the bolt facing upwards and the trigger south."The Dallas Police Officers that examined the rifle on the scene claimed that the rifle was indeed a Mannlicher-Carcano. Some later wrote reports to that effect, including Lieutenant J. C. Day and Detective C. N. Dhority. The rifle was photographed in place by Studebaker, showing a Carcano.. Alyea filmed the rifle in place as well as Lieutenant J.C. Day removing it from the floor, again it was a Carcano in this film. In November of 1963, Craig didn't say anything about "Mauser" being stamped on the rifle. He simply made this up later. If Craig did see Mauser stamped on the barrel on 11/22/63, rest assured he would have reported it. He didn't. Not until later when he wanted to make money off of his story.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 24, 2010, 07:08:04 AM by Bill Brown »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 24, 2010, 03:45:22 PM
|
Newbie
Posts: 47
|
I thought roger craig got it from seymour weitzman (wrong spelling?) that it was a mauser? Cos I remember him sayin that he was a gun buff and runned sporting good store.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 24, 2010, 03:57:34 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 8002
|
Why Roger Craig Bill?
Roger Craig was interviewed in 1968 by the Los Angeles Free Press. In that interview he was asked if he handled the rifle. This was his response: "Yes, I did. I couldn't give its name because I don't know foreign rifles, I know it was foreign made, and you loaded it downward into a built-in clip. The ID man took it and ejected one live round from it. The scope was facing north, the bolt facing upwards and the trigger south."The Dallas Police Officers that examined the rifle on the scene claimed that the rifle was indeed a Mannlicher-Carcano. Some later wrote reports to that effect, including Lieutenant J. C. Day and Detective C. N. Dhority. The rifle was photographed in place by Studebaker, showing a Carcano.. Alyea filmed the rifle in place as well as Lieutenant J.C. Day removing it from the floor, again it was a Carcano in this film. In November of 1963, Craig didn't say anything about "Mauser" being stamped on the rifle. He simply made this up later. If Craig did see Mauser stamped on the barrel on 11/22/63, rest assured he would have reported it. He didn't. Not until later when he wanted to make money off of his story. Duh. Craig never got any money. 
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 25, 2010, 05:20:50 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 7886
|
Quote by Miles Scull:Duh. Craig never got any money. Duh. I never said that he did.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 25, 2010, 05:21:46 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 7886
|
I thought roger craig got it from seymour weitzman (wrong spelling?) that it was a mauser? Cos I remember him sayin that he was a gun buff and runned sporting good store.
Originally, yes.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 25, 2010, 10:21:56 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 633
|
I thought roger craig got it from seymour weitzman (wrong spelling?) that it was a mauser? Cos I remember him sayin that he was a gun buff and runned sporting good store.
Weitzman was a  - as was Fritz, as proved by their official affidavits (i.e. legal documents as they, of all people well knew) regarding the rifle being a Mauser. Therefore, by deduction, it seems that Craig must also have been a .
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
