HomeSubscribe Live FeedJFK Research Photo GalleryStoreJFK Youtube ChannelArticlesSearchLinksNotepadLoginRegister
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2012, 05:16:16 AM
News:

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Z film/ James Chaney  (Read 2530 times)

Jr. Member
**

Posts: 55


Hi, just wondered if I could have some opinions, please and thank you.
I've followed, with much interest, the current debate on other forums regarding whether or not Mr. Zapruder's film has been altered, and a few things have caught my attention, the first of which follows...
Regarding whether motorcycle officer James Chaney passed the limousine has left me with a bit of a head scratcher. In the first instance, the Zapruder film does not show this, but 'IF' said film was altered to remove this, then that would be understandable, but to me that seems a stretch. However, neither the Nix, Bell, Daniel or Paschall films show a motorcycle anywhere near Curry's car, or the limo, as it reaches the underpass. What are visible in the Bell film, are three motorcycle officers who seem to be at a standstill, or slow crawl, on the west side of the underpass near the Stemmons freeway sliproad, with another motorcycle officer parked side-on, to their left. I have included some photos, from Mr Unger's gallery, of three motorcycle officers taken from the west side of the underpass as the limo approaches (Mr. Unger, if you read this, I sincerely hope you do not object to me using images from your site, if so, I will cease and desist).

As you will notice, the caption states that one of the riders is officer Chaney, (personally I don't know if it is or not so I would need confirmation from someone who does). Now, I am no photographic or film expert, but i'm hard pushed to believe for an instant that either the Paschall or Bell films are altered in anyway, so how, and when, has Chaney managed to reach this point in the time frame alloted, especially as he stated he witnessed the head shot, and the fact that the Nix film shows the two bikes to the right rear of the limo, one of which i'm assuming to be Chaney, slowing or coming to a stop at the point in time when the limo has started accelerating?  Even allowing Chaney a stop/ slow rolling conversation to relay info to the lead car, he is in a position at the Stemmons entrance before the limo has cleared the underpass as seen here in a frame from Mark Bell's film.


Neither SA Kellerman nor SA Greer mention a motorcycle passing in front of them in their Warren Comission testimonies, and the statements or testimonies of the lead car occupants are, by my reckoning, also pretty vague as to the timing of this. Only Chief Curry has stated that the officer was Chaney, but his recollection of WHEN this happened, in my opinion, seems questionable. Here's a couple of examples :

 April 15th 1964 WCXII (page 28), Chief Curry : "...and at that time I looked in my rear view mirror and I saw some commotion in the President's caravan and realized that probably something was wrong, and it seemed to be speeding up, and ABOUT (emphasis mine) this time a motorcycle officer, I believe it was officer Chaney rode up beside us...."
He also reiterates this point in testimony, April 22nd 1964 WCIV (page 161) ....
Rep. Ford : 'Did you get this order over the PA system before the second and third shots'?
Curry : " I don't believe so, I am not sure. I am not positive. Because they (shots) were in rapid succession. But after I noticed some commotion in the President's car and a motorcycle officer ran up aside of me....I said "Has the President been hit...?" And he said "I am sure they have", I said "Take us to the hospital immediately." 'and I got on the radio and told them to notify Parkland'

At no point does Curry state where the limo is in relation to the motorcycle officer.

WCVII (page 346) ( Forrest V Sorrels, statement Nov 28th 1963) 
Sorrels : 'I noted that the President's car had accelerated it's speed and was fast closing the gap between us. A motorcycle officer pulled up alongside of the car and Chief Curry yelled "Is anybody hurt?" '....By that time we'd had gotten (unreadable) the underpass when the President's car pulled up alongside, and at that time Chief Curry's car had started to pick up speed...'

Sorrels states that a bike pulls alongside them, but, again, seems pretty vague as to when, in my opinion.

WCVII (page 548) Testimony dated May 7th 1964, Forrest V. Sorrels : 'Within about 3 seconds, there were two more similar reports. And I said. "Let's get out of here" and looked back, all the way back, then, to where the President's car was, and I saw some confusion, movement there, and the car just seemed to lurch forward. And, in the meantime, a motorcycle officer had run up on the right-hand side and the chief yelled to him, "Anybody hurt?"...'And by that time we had gotten almost in under the underpass, and the President's car had come up and was almost abreast of us. When I saw them get so close, I said, "Let's get out quick," or "Get going fast," or something to that effect. In other words, I didn't want them to pass us, because I knew we were supposed to be in front.'

Both the McIntyre pic, above, and frames from the Daniel film, however, show that the limo did overtake the lead car.

WCXVII (page 629) statement of Winston G. Lawson, 23rd Nov 1963, Lawson : ....'I believe I heard two more sharp reports and looking back saw people scurrying away from the route, as though they were taking cover. Almost immediately the President's car leaped ahead. We also rapidly accelerated'.

No mention of any motorcycle, but the first admission that the limo has overtaken the lead car as verified by McIntyre/ Daniels..

WCXVII (page632) statement of Winston G. Lawson, 1st Dec 1963, Lawson : ...'I heard the first loud, sharp report and in more rapid sucession two more sounds like gunfire...Both the President's car and our lead car rapidly accelerated almost simultaneously. I heard a report over the two-way radio that we should proceed to the nearest hospital'....'A motorcycle officer pulled alongside our lead car....''

Now mentions motorcycle, but no mention of JFK's limo overtaking the lead car. Now, the two cars have apparently accelerated in unison, and by the timeline of his statement, the bike has pulled up besides them AFTER the limo has started accelerating.

WCXIV (pages 353/4) testimony of Winston G. Lawson,                   
Dulles : What was the lead car doing at this time?
Lawson : The car that I was in, sir?
Dulles : I thought you were in the second car.
Stern : The pilot car
Dulles : The pilot car, not the lead car.
Lawson : The pilot car was up ahead of us, so appeared other things I recall noting a police officer pulled up in a motorcycle alongside of us, and mentioned that the President had been hit. When the President's car leaped ahead, although there was quite a distance, not quite a distance but there was some distance between the two cars, they came up on us quite fast BEFORE (emphasis mine) we were actually able to get in motion. They seemed to have a more rapid acceleration than we did.
Dulles : Did they actually pass you?
Lawson : No, sir ; they never did. We stayed ahead of them....

So, now Lawson testifies that the car leaped ahead before they could get going, but never actually passed them. What? The poor guy seems confused, like he can't remember what story he's been told to say, again, in my opinion. This also says the lead car had practically stopped at, or in, the underpass.

Secret Service Agent Sam Kinney (driver of the follow-up car behind JFK's limo) — indicates, via his report to Chief Rowley, that Greer hit the gas after the fatal head shot to JFK and after the President's slump to the left toward Jackie. [18 H 731-732]. From the HSCA's 2/26/78 interview of Kinney: "He also remarked that 'when Greer (the driver of the Presidential limousine) looked back, his foot must have come off the accelerator' Kinney observed that at the time of the first shot, the speed of the motorcade was '3 to 5 miles an hour.'"
No mention of a stop, just a slowing down. If anyone would notice brake lights on the limo, it would have been Kinney.

Interestingly, of all the witnesses cited as having seen the limo slow or stop, very few, if any, has said that Chaney rode forward at this time. No 'lay witnesses' mention anything of a motorcycle breaking away from the motorcade at the time of the head shot, how come? Am I missing something?

Thoughts?

Thanks, Calli.


-------------------------

-------------------------
'Jumping out of trees that tall is not an easy task, regardless of age (it’s easier to just fall out of it)' --- Keller Jackson

   ReplyReply
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 341


Calli.
I haven't followed this particular "problem" but I've certainly heard of it.

First of all, the first photo you posted could only show Chaney in the foreground IF he was already way ahead of the limo before the murder.
It's impossible for him to be that far up front if he was riding slightly abreast/behind the pres' limo as we believe(that is of course, if you/we trust what the other films are showing).

Chaney stopped with Hargis & the others & the limo took off fast with all four bike still dwindling there.
Bell shows the limo entering the underpass at speed & the Daniel film picks it up on the otherside within a second or two. No bikes there at all.
If that is Chaney in the overpass in the same photo above he could of caught up to Curry in around ten seconds.

If you read phrases from witnesses like, "about this time", "at exactly the same time", "immeadiatly after" & take them literally you're frequently going to encounterer problems.

Maybe I'm missing something?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2633


Quote:

(Mr. Unger, if you read this, I sincerely hope you do not object to me using images from your site, if so, I will cease and desist).


No Problem.

That is the reason the Image Galleries were created ,so that all may share.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2633


The same three lead Motorcycles ahead of Curry's car







The lead motorcycles seen in Bell.


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2633


I will have a look in Trask's " Pictures of the pain " to try and get a correct identity for the lead cyclists


Chaney was assighned to the right rear of kennedy's Limo, on the inside.
he wasn't one of the three lead motorcycles.





-------------------------
« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 08:59:21 AM by Robin Unger »

   ReplyReply

Jr. Member
**

Posts: 55


Alan, thanks for your reply. Firstly, if i'm giving off the impression i'm taking the witness statements literally, then I apologise, it was not my intention to do so. I do try and remain objective and interpret as best as I can, but a lot of the time, with regards to most evidence, it feels like 'pin the tail on the donkey'.
I also have to disagree with your 'ten seconds to Curry's car' train of thought for the simple reason that none of the films, from any angle/ location show any bike, let alone Chaney's, passing the limo. If that is Chaney in the Bell frame beyond the underpass, then there's a problem.
It stands to reason that if Chaney had indeed stopped in DP, even for a second, then it cannot possibly be him pictured at the Stemmons ramp in the time frame allowed. The limo hasn't stopped since it gunned it from the plaza, and the only bikes visible on the Bell and Daniels film are still lagging behind, so that leads to the only other alternative being the officer at Stemmons, is not Chaney. I do not believe footage from Bell, Paschall, Daniel is altered. That goes for the Zfilm at the time the limo approaches the underpass also, there is no way it has been edited to remove a bike passing the limo.

Robin, thank you. Sterling work, btw.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 374


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Alan, thanks for your reply. Firstly, if i'm giving off the impression i'm taking the witness statements literally, then I apologise, it was not my intention to do so. I do try and remain objective and interpret as best as I can, but a lot of the time, with regards to most evidence, it feels like 'pin the tail on the donkey'.
I also have to disagree with your 'ten seconds to Curry's car' train of thought for the simple reason that none of the films, from any angle/ location show any bike, let alone Chaney's, passing the limo. If that is Chaney in the Bell frame beyond the underpass, then there's a problem.
It stands to reason that if Chaney had indeed stopped in DP, even for a second, then it cannot possibly be him pictured at the Stemmons ramp in the time frame allowed. The limo hasn't stopped since it gunned it from the plaza, and the only bikes visible on the Bell and Daniels film are still lagging behind, so that leads to the only other alternative being the officer at Stemmons, is not Chaney. I do not believe footage from Bell, Paschall, Daniel is altered. That goes for the Zfilm at the time the limo approaches the underpass also, there is no way it has been edited to remove a bike passing the limo.

Robin, thank you. Sterling work, btw.

You are correct.  The officer at the Stemmons on ramp is not Chaney.  Compare Chaney below to the on ramp photo.

Best regards,
Jerry



-------------------------
« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 01:14:25 PM by Jerry Logan »

   ReplyReply

Jr. Member
**

Posts: 55




You are correct.  The officer at the Stemmons on ramp is not Chaney.  Compare Chaney below to the on ramp photo.

Best regards,
Jerry


Jerry, thank you for your reply. If this is indeed the case, then it makes a mockery of the various testimonies made by the lead car occupants, and various other witnesses as regards when Chaney conversed with the lead car. I now assume this had to have happened nearer, or more than likey on, Stemmons freeway. It also seems to support the case that Mr. Zapruder's film was not altered to remove a pass that Chaney never made. Am I close?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 374


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


You are correct.  The officer at the Stemmons on ramp is not Chaney.  Compare Chaney below to the on ramp photo.

Best regards,
Jerry


Jerry, thank you for your reply. If this is indeed the case, then it makes a mockery of the various testimonies made by the lead car occupants, and various other witnesses as regards when Chaney conversed with the lead car. I now assume this had to have happened nearer, or more than likey on, Stemmons freeway. It also seems to support the case that Mr. Zapruder's film was not altered to remove a pass that Chaney never made. Am I close?

Calli,

Gary Mack asked Chief Curry about  where Chaney caught up with him and Curry said they met up near the end of the on ramp.  The eyewitnesses are not wrong - but the alterationists have construed their words to imply instant action rather than something that evolved over time. Alan was right about this. And photos that were never in government hands (like McIntyre) confirm Zapruder.

Best regards,
Jerry


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 341


Calli,
just to confirm.
There are two bikes there near the underpass in that Mcintyre photo, way back in the distance.
One is still in the shadow of the underpass & the other having just exited(on our right), both still behind the Queen Mary as we look.
So, it's ten seconds to catch Curry from that position if the car he was in was lingering to gather details on what had just occured.

Also, yes sorry, I said "If you take things witnesses said literally...", I should have wrote WE!  I really meant us, everyone, honest.  :)

Of course, picking up on what someone has stated & checking that with films & photos is the natural thing to do but how often do they sync?
In my part-time experience, hardly ever.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 2633


Daniel Frame.


I have an idea that this trailing motorcyle in line with Curry's car may be Chaney ?






Bell Frame.










Correction from Gary Mack:


Robin,

No, the officer in the south lane in your Daniel film blowup is B.J. Martin.  Martin rode at the left rear of JFK with Bobby Hargis.  The officer in the north lane in the McIntire photo is Jim Chaney.  Chaney rode on the right side with Doug Jackson.  Both men slowed, but Chaney took off right away.  That Daniel frame is 15-20 seconds after the head shot.

As Chief Curry told me in 1979, he spoke with Chaney on the access ramp to Stemmons.  At that time, the McIntire photo was unknown, but now I know that the area to which Curry referred was past McIntire's location.  And Mel McIntire's photos were never out of his possession at any time.  They were first published in 1983 in a Dallas Times Herald 20th anniversary special.

Gary Mack


-------------------------
« Last Edit: January 17, 2010, 04:19:26 AM by Robin Unger »

   ReplyReply

Jr. Member
**

Posts: 55


Jerry, Alan, & Robin, thank you all for taking the time on this one, I appreciate your time and efforts. I've been a little busy with work commitments over the weekend, so I apologise that I couldn't reply any sooner.

As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Of course, picking up on what someone has stated & checking that with films & photos is the natural thing to do but how often do they sync?
In my part-time experience, hardly ever.
.

Too true, my friend, too true.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Gallery

JFKForum.com

JFK Assassination Kennedy Assassination JFK Assassination Forum JFK Dealey Plaza Dallas November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines