|
|
 January 14, 2010, 06:10:47 PM
|
Sr. Member
Posts: 372
|
Buy it here if you like. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginI heard a story, and I think the source is reliable. It goes like this… Zapbruder knew that he had something important on his ‘Super 8′ camera. He took the film immediately to Kodak to have it processed. He also asked for two (maybe three) copies be made. Copying a Super 8, is far different from emailing an MP3, there is always loss of quality in copying an analog source. It was the copies that we have seen countless times in the news and documentaries. The original film resided in a vault for many years. Technology has changed over the almost 5 decades since the assassination. The Zapruder family agreed to share that all important ‘prime’ copy with a film maker. The entire film was photographed frame by frame. It might sound odd, but this actually enhances the original. They also managed to capture the film between the sprocket holes. This might not sound important, but, data is data. The tape is only 26 seconds long, and there are two frames that remain a mystery, a road sign gets in the way. I do not classify myself as a conspiracy theorist, but watching this DVD makes me wonder about the laws of physics. That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind. This fresh look at the Zapruder tape is a must have for any JFK sleuth. You can order your copy by clicking on the cover art above. Simon Barrett link = As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
-------------------------
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 06:37:10 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2085
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. 
-------------------------
-------------------------
An opinion based on something other than fact, is an opinion based on ignorance. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 09:11:52 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 8002
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. Duncan, wonder if you could shed some light on this for the forum. Is this head motion (forward, then back) the result of a one bullet impact or of a two bullet impact? If two, where did they originate? If one, where did it originate? What's occurring here? Thanks
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 09:23:04 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1611
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. Excellant Have you done any others like this. It would be interesting to see one of Connally's shoulder buckle. Looks like his head move down and to the right?
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 09:31:27 PM by Gary Craig »
|
-------------------------
Too often we... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 09:38:12 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2085
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. Excellant Have you done any others like this. It would be interesting to see one of Connally's shoulder buckle. Looks like his head move down and to the right? Hi Gary, I'm afraid I can't take credit for the image analysis. I believe it may belong to forum member Robert Harris
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 09:38:47 PM by Duncan MacRae »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 09:41:25 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2085
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. Duncan, wonder if you could shed some light on this for the forum. Is this head motion (forward, then back) the result of a one bullet impact or of a two bullet impact? If two, where did they originate? If one, where did it originate? What's occurring here? Thanks I don't have a definitive answer Miles, sorry.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 10:37:47 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 552
|
Duncan may be refering to the so called "jet effect" the trajectory of the bullet or neospasm reaction.
johnw
I don't have a definitive answer Miles, sorry.
[/quote]
-------------------------
-------------------------
(To Gary Mack) Perhaps if you would release some of the first generation images you are hoarding at the 6th floor museum, researchers like myself, wouldn't be forced to rely on 2nd,3rd,4th generation copies, and then put up with you criticizing us when we do_
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2010, 11:48:11 PM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2085
|
Duncan, Maybe you can answer this question by yourself thumbs1xx Shall we say, in a normal situation Abe is following the limousine in what is known in videography as a simple left-to-right pan. The camera's focus is following the car so by and large the images in the car are not ghosted. It is and would be expected thaqt in a pan shot, fixed images in the background will be blurred by ghosting becuase there is movement during the exposure. So the ghosting of the man, the boy and the flash from the Babushka Lady camera are quite normal. But what's not normal is the other figures to the right are not ghosted and should be. It is as if they are moving in unision with the car which we know is not possible. The indicates a visual aberration or anomaly. If this were the original Z film this simply could not be happening. It has been subjected to some type of visual processing. johnw  I don't believe in alteration John. I believe that what we see in the Zapruder film, and every other film and photograph, is exactly how things happened, excluding accidental damage. To alter the Zapruder film would have meant having to alter every other film and photo capture taken that day. Obtaining all of the films and photographs would have been an impossible to arrange pre-arranged task which would have required a knowledge of EVERYONE who was going to take a film or photograph. The alteration theory, and that's all it is, is just nuts! Duncan
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 11:54:33 PM by Duncan MacRae »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 15, 2010, 12:17:00 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2131
|
To alter the Zapruder film would have meant having to alter every other film and photo capture taken that day. Obtaining all of the films and photographs would have been an impossible to arrange pre-arranged task which would have required a knowledge of EVERYONE who was going to take a film or photograph.
The alteration theory, and that's all it is, is just nuts!
Duncan,
your sounding like the anti jack.
the alteration theory does not have to include all the films, just a few for the public viewing whom
would not have been the wiser.
do you wish to see the image of the shooter???
johnw
Hi johnw. Great to have you back hugsxx I can't speak for Duncan, but I would like to see this image of the shooter.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 15, 2010, 02:47:50 AM by Rick Needham »
|
-------------------------
But peace does not rest in the charters and covenants alone. It lies in the hearts and minds of all people- John F. Kennedy
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
