|
|
 January 14, 2010, 06:10:47 PM
|
Sr. Member
Posts: 372
|
Buy it here if you like. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginI heard a story, and I think the source is reliable. It goes like this… Zapbruder knew that he had something important on his ‘Super 8′ camera. He took the film immediately to Kodak to have it processed. He also asked for two (maybe three) copies be made. Copying a Super 8, is far different from emailing an MP3, there is always loss of quality in copying an analog source. It was the copies that we have seen countless times in the news and documentaries. The original film resided in a vault for many years. Technology has changed over the almost 5 decades since the assassination. The Zapruder family agreed to share that all important ‘prime’ copy with a film maker. The entire film was photographed frame by frame. It might sound odd, but this actually enhances the original. They also managed to capture the film between the sprocket holes. This might not sound important, but, data is data. The tape is only 26 seconds long, and there are two frames that remain a mystery, a road sign gets in the way. I do not classify myself as a conspiracy theorist, but watching this DVD makes me wonder about the laws of physics. That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind. This fresh look at the Zapruder tape is a must have for any JFK sleuth. You can order your copy by clicking on the cover art above. Simon Barrett link = As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
-------------------------
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
|
|
January 15, 2010, 11:04:02 AM
|
Group: Administrator
Super Member
Posts: 2085
|
Duncan,
do you wish to see the image of the shooter???
johnw
Sure John.
-------------------------
-------------------------
An opinion based on something other than fact, is an opinion based on ignorance. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 16, 2010, 12:45:52 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 552
|
Duncan,
Please explain the glow effect witnesess in the Z-frames
thanks hugsxx
johnw
-------------------------
-------------------------
(To Gary Mack) Perhaps if you would release some of the first generation images you are hoarding at the 6th floor museum, researchers like myself, wouldn't be forced to rely on 2nd,3rd,4th generation copies, and then put up with you criticizing us when we do_
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2010, 03:38:32 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1044
God knows
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward.  very nice gif, very insightful. jfk's head does move foward briefly , simultaneously with the head shot impact. but these gif's has given more insight than ever before. i am beginning to see the impact point . cheers! clapxx
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 13, 2010, 03:40:01 AM by Kanavit Choonit »
|
-------------------------
Let justice be done, or the heavens fall.
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2010, 05:52:03 PM
|
Full Member
Posts: 186
|
Buy it here if you like. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginI heard a story, and I think the source is reliable. It goes like this… Zapbruder knew that he had something important on his ‘Super 8′ camera. He took the film immediately to Kodak to have it processed. He also asked for two (maybe three) copies be made. Copying a Super 8, is far different from emailing an MP3, there is always loss of quality in copying an analog source. It was the copies that we have seen countless times in the news and documentaries. The original film resided in a vault for many years. Technology has changed over the almost 5 decades since the assassination. The Zapruder family agreed to share that all important ‘prime’ copy with a film maker. The entire film was photographed frame by frame. It might sound odd, but this actually enhances the original. They also managed to capture the film between the sprocket holes. This might not sound important, but, data is data. The tape is only 26 seconds long, and there are two frames that remain a mystery, a road sign gets in the way. I do not classify myself as a conspiracy theorist, but watching this DVD makes me wonder about the laws of physics. That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind. This fresh look at the Zapruder tape is a must have for any JFK sleuth. You can order your copy by clicking on the cover art above. Simon Barrett link = As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginWilliam, just ordered a new copy on Ebay for $12 shipped. Thanks for the info.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2010, 12:35:46 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 555
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. Duncan, wonder if you could shed some light on this for the forum. Is this head motion (forward, then back) the result of a one bullet impact or of a two bullet impact? If two, where did they originate? If one, where did it originate? What's occurring here? Thanks I don't have a definitive answer Miles, sorry. I have a definitive answer Miles Tink Thompson was correct in his classic 1967 book "Six Seconds In Dallas" (Tink now says he was wrong) IMO Tink was correct JFK was hit twice in the head, please read SSID if you have not done so already, Tink does a great job of explaining the Double Head Hit
-------------------------
-------------------------
"Pictures don't lie-unless they are made to" Harold Weisberg 1966
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2010, 07:44:12 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 7999
|
That second shot, the deadly one, throws JFK back, this makes no sense if the shooter was behind.
It doesn't, it forces his head forward. Duncan, wonder if you could shed some light on this for the forum. Is this head motion (forward, then back) the result of a one bullet impact or of a two bullet impact? If two, where did they originate? If one, where did it originate? What's occurring here? Thanks I don't have a definitive answer Miles, sorry. I have a definitive answer Miles Tink Thompson was correct in his classic 1967 book "Six Seconds In Dallas" (Tink now says he was wrong) IMO Tink was correct JFK was hit twice in the head, please read SSID if you have not done so already, Tink does a great job of explaining the Double Head Hit Why did Tink change his mind?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
