Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room  (Read 13429 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« on: September 13, 2018, 08:12:02 AM »
Advertisement
Not one person in this photo looks at Ruby as he approaches Oswald.
Everyone is focussed on the 'basketball', so-to-speak.

Ruby is indeed the 'invisible gorilla'



« Last Edit: September 13, 2018, 05:44:48 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« on: September 13, 2018, 08:12:02 AM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2018, 10:18:10 AM »
Exactly Tony, again you prove the gorilla theory, Fritz didn't see Ruby but that doesn't mean that Ruby wasn't there.

JohnM

He probably did after the shot.

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2018, 11:01:25 AM »
He probably did after the shot.

Fritz didn't see Ruby before the shot because Studebaker and Day hadn't created him yet.

Don't ask me how Fritz's prints got on Ruby.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2018, 11:01:25 AM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2018, 12:11:29 PM »
Fritz didn't see Ruby before the shot because Studebaker and Day hadn't created him yet.

Don't ask me how Fritz's prints got on Ruby.

Not sure how to break this to you Howard but it?s biologically impossible for two males to create another human. Also wouldn?t it be Oswald's prints on Ruby in this analogy?

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2018, 12:17:48 PM »

But you are right about one thing, psychologists would have a field day going through the truly insane conspiracy posts that are regularly seen on this forum. Hehehe!

JohnM

Speaking of conspiracy......when do you think that Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired to lie to the authorities about Williams movements in the 15 minutes before the shots?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2018, 12:17:48 PM »


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2018, 01:18:20 PM »
Not sure how to break this to you Howard but it?s biologically impossible for two males to create another human. Also wouldn?t it be Oswald's prints on Ruby in this analogy?

Minor objections, my friend.

Can you prove two males can't create another human ?

How do you know Studebaker and Day didn't use their time machine to travel into the future and bring back advanced cloning techology to create Ruby ?

I don't know whose prints should be where, but that doesn't matter either because the prints were either read incorrectly and/or planted. Besides, isn't it obvious that Oswald might have pressed his palm into Ruby sometime during interrogation ?

Also can you explain why there isn't a single photograph of Ruby in the basement before he charges towards Saint Oz and ventilates him ?

Why no in situ photo of Ruby in the basement before he rushes Oz ?

C'mon man, it's obvious Studebaker and Day created Ruby.  8)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2018, 01:51:08 PM »
Minor objections, my friend.

Can you prove two males can't create another human ?

How do you know Studebaker and Day didn't use their time machine to travel into the future and bring back advanced cloning techology to create Ruby ?

I don't know whose prints should be where, but that doesn't matter either because the prints were either read incorrectly and/or planted. Besides, isn't it obvious that Oswald might have pressed his palm into Ruby sometime during interrogation ?

Also can you explain why there isn't a single photograph of Ruby in the basement before he charges towards Saint Oz and ventilates him ?

Why no in situ photo of Ruby in the basement before he rushes Oz ?

C'mon man, it's obvious Studebaker and Day created Ruby.  8)

While we wait for JohnM......why not give us your best guess on the conspiracy between Williams, Jarman and Norman? When did they decide to lie?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2018, 01:51:08 PM »


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2018, 03:30:59 PM »
While we wait for JohnM......why not give us your best guess on the conspiracy between Williams, Jarman and Norman? When did they decide to lie?

Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired and decided to lie immediately after the assassination.

They did so because they felt guilty about causing the assassination.

How did they cause the assassination, you ask ?

Here's how...

Williams, Jarman and Norman accidently discovered the 3+ foot cheese sandwich that Saint Patsy had smuggled into the depository. Without any consideration for Saint Oz, each of them ate a foot of the sandwich and left nothing but a few crumbs for Oz.

Naturally, Oz was livid when he discovered his gigantic cheese sandwich had been stolen and devoured.

Oz was so ticked off that he decided to shoot all 3 of the cheese sandwich thieves.

But at the last minute he changed his mind and decided to shoot JFK instead.

The whole BRW story about eating a bone-in chicken sandwich is an obvious fabrication designed to cover up the fact that he was part of the cheese sandwich theft which ultimately resulted in JFK getting his melon blown off.

If they had only known how attached Oz was to his cheese sandwich and how grumpy he got when he was hungry, the entire assassination could have been avoided.

That's why they conspired and lied.